and that appeals don't state another mod HAS to check and evaluate it
trolleyz is doing his name justice here
leo, if you're talking about devante being the other mod to check it, if he deferred his judgment to somebody else because he wasn't used to modding sandbox, don't you think that sounds like he was going to no vio it?
leo, being the first to vio it and being the second to sustain are two completely separate things.
in a discussion, i could easily see people going with the "yeah that word is bad enough, its IC" approach, hence why terry's vio sustained. at this point though, it should be a vio for everyone which is what terry is complaining about because its not being followed through on
edit: since leo doesn't seem to get it. i am implying i think uranus was the only mod that would've given him a vio for the report that was filed and thats how he drew the short stick.
sustaining his appeal is a completely separate matter
You ran into the only person on this site that lacks the reading comprehension to understand what you were saying
inb4 I'm accused of thinking there's only one person on this site
troll edits his reply rather than saying it outright, nice
no, sustaining it is not a different matter. it is agreeing with the decision made. doing so is the ENTIRE POINT OF AN APPEAL.
there is no 'short stick' here when two mods agree that it was IC. what you think of it is different as well, rather than stating only ONE would have made the decision.
it's completely relevant because you took my opinion on the matter ( i think uranus was the only mod that would actually give him a vio for it ) and then tried to twist the facts into something that refutes it.
i can see most mods sustaining the vio, but i really honestly don't believe most mods would've given the vio based off the first report
my condolences terry. as i said in the thread, i think you just really got the short end of the stick and *had the only mod that would give you a vio for your use moderate your report*
that's not even relevant
i am literally talking about a line you said, nearly word for word, on why it's dumb.
and that appeals don't state another mod HAS to check and evaluate it
trolleyz is doing his name justice here
leo, if you're talking about devante being the other mod to check it, if he deferred his judgment to somebody else because he wasn't used to modding sandbox, don't you think that sounds like he was going to no vio it?
leo, being the first to vio it and being the second to sustain are two completely separate things.
in a discussion, i could easily see people going with the "yeah that word is bad enough, its IC" approach, hence why terry's vio sustained. at this point though, it should be a vio for everyone which is what terry is complaining about because its not being followed through on
edit: since leo doesn't seem to get it. i am implying i think uranus was the only mod that would've given him a vio for the report that was filed and thats how he drew the short stick.
sustaining his appeal is a completely separate matter
Trolleyz, I literally reported everyone else who participated in the discussion about sexual assault because they censor bypassed. No one else but me got the IC vio.
my condolences terry. as i said in the thread, i think you just really got the short end of the stick and had the only mod that would give you a vio for your use moderate your report
the words 'bad enough' to warrant making it IC in retrospect so mods are probably backing the ruling and now everybody that uses the word should be getting IC and not just you
Trolleyz, I literally reported everyone else who participated in the discussion about sexual assault because they censor bypassed. No one else but me got the IC vio.
Terry I haven't looked over those other reports but I didn't handle them so accusing me of bias is a bit silly. Your creepy PM's aren't appreciated. I try to be as fair as I can and believe it or not, I don't do every report myself!