almost 9 years

I got reported for censor bypassing the r-word (not the one about mental incapabilities. The type of sexual assault.)

I used it objectively and not in an insulting form.

https://epicmafia.com/report/167578

Yet 7 other people were reported for doing the same exact thing, and they were all NV'd.

Why are mods such trash?

almost 9 years

MeetTerry says


leo says


MeetTerry says

Leo stop talking you can barely argue or even defend a point

You always go to this lazy cop-out approach where you don't even respond and just try to undermine/joke at what I say. It's laughable.


didn't even talk to you. apparently you forgot your own report, and if you insult me again, i'll report you for harassment.


apparently it's harassment now to tell someone they don't ever adequately counter my arguments nor respond in a serious matter


> Leo stop talking you can barely argue or even defend a point
> [ your arguing and i'm implying your entire attitude ] is laughable

pave, i'll happily link the report terry made if you're going to undermine what actually happened.
almost 9 years
You can block people on the forums if they hurt your feelings.
almost 9 years

leo says


MeetTerry says

Leo stop talking you can barely argue or even defend a point

You always go to this lazy cop-out approach where you don't even respond and just try to undermine/joke at what I say. It's laughable.


didn't even talk to you. apparently you forgot your own report, and if you insult me again, i'll report you for harassment.


apparently it's harassment now to tell someone they don't ever adequately counter my arguments or respond in a serious matter
almost 9 years
Don't make him cry, Terry
almost 9 years

MeetTerry says

Leo stop talking you can barely argue or even defend a point

You always go to this lazy cop-out approach where you don't even respond and just try to undermine/joke at what I say. It's laughable.


didn't even talk to you. apparently you forgot your own report, and if you insult me again, i'll report you for harassment.
almost 9 years

trolleyz says


leo says

"the only mod" implying two mods didn't check it

and that appeals don't state another mod HAS to check and evaluate it

trolleyz is doing his name justice here


leo, if you're talking about devante being the other mod to check it, if he deferred his judgment to somebody else because he wasn't used to modding sandbox, don't you think that sounds like he was going to no vio it?

leo, being the first to vio it and being the second to sustain are two completely separate things.

in a discussion, i could easily see people going with the "yeah that word is bad enough, its IC" approach, hence why terry's vio sustained. at this point though, it should be a vio for everyone which is what terry is complaining about because its not being followed through on


edit: since leo doesn't seem to get it. i am implying i think uranus was the only mod that would've given him a vio for the report that was filed and thats how he drew the short stick.

sustaining his appeal is a completely separate matter



You ran into the only person on this site that lacks the reading comprehension to understand what you were saying

inb4 I'm accused of thinking there's only one person on this site
almost 9 years
troll edits his reply rather than saying it outright, nice

no, sustaining it is not a different matter. it is agreeing with the decision made. doing so is the ENTIRE POINT OF AN APPEAL.

there is no 'short stick' here when two mods agree that it was IC. what you think of it is different as well, rather than stating only ONE would have made the decision.
almost 9 years
Leo stop talking you can barely argue or even defend a point

You always go to this lazy cop-out approach where you don't even respond and just try to undermine/joke at what I say. It's laughable.
almost 9 years
it's completely relevant because you took my opinion on the matter ( i think uranus was the only mod that would actually give him a vio for it ) and then tried to twist the facts into something that refutes it.

i can see most mods sustaining the vio, but i really honestly don't believe most mods would've given the vio based off the first report
almost 9 years

trolleyz says

my condolences terry. as i said in the thread, i think you just really got the short end of the stick and *had the only mod that would give you a vio for your use moderate your report*






that's not even relevant

i am literally talking about a line you said, nearly word for word, on why it's dumb.
almost 9 years

leo says

"the only mod" implying two mods didn't check it

and that appeals don't state another mod HAS to check and evaluate it

trolleyz is doing his name justice here


leo, if you're talking about devante being the other mod to check it, if he deferred his judgment to somebody else because he wasn't used to modding sandbox, don't you think that sounds like he was going to no vio it?

leo, being the first to vio it and being the second to sustain are two completely separate things.

in a discussion, i could easily see people going with the "yeah that word is bad enough, its IC" approach, hence why terry's vio sustained. at this point though, it should be a vio for everyone which is what terry is complaining about because its not being followed through on


edit: since leo doesn't seem to get it. i am implying i think uranus was the only mod that would've given him a vio for the report that was filed and thats how he drew the short stick.

sustaining his appeal is a completely separate matter
almost 9 years
"the only mod" implying two mods didn't check it

and that appeals don't state another mod HAS to check and evaluate it

trolleyz is doing his name justice here
almost 9 years

MeetTerry says

Trolleyz, I literally reported everyone else who participated in the discussion about sexual assault because they censor bypassed. No one else but me got the IC vio.


my condolences terry. as i said in the thread, i think you just really got the short end of the stick and had the only mod that would give you a vio for your use moderate your report

the words 'bad enough' to warrant making it IC in retrospect so mods are probably backing the ruling and now everybody that uses the word should be getting IC and not just you
almost 9 years

eris says


sweetnkind says


Pavoneo says

god hates f­aggots and so do i








That's not a bad impression
deletedalmost 9 years

sweetnkind says


Pavoneo says

god hates f­aggots and so do i




deletedalmost 9 years

Pavoneo says

god hates f­aggots and so do i

almost 9 years

eris says


sweetnkind says


Chaika says

R­etard is a terrible word and shouldn't be used, you should know better, MeetTerry.


look at this censor bypass


WHOA


Do me next
deletedalmost 9 years

sweetnkind says


Chaika says

R­etard is a terrible word and shouldn't be used, you should know better, MeetTerry.


look at this censor bypass


WHOA
deletedalmost 9 years

Chaika says

R­etard is a terrible word and shouldn't be used, you should know better, MeetTerry.


look at this censor bypass
almost 9 years
Just use sexual assault, next time.
deletedalmost 9 years
Quick sweep it under the rug and pretend its not real
deletedalmost 9 years
Doesn't
almost 9 years
how does stopping people from talking about an issue help it
almost 9 years
Trolleyz, I literally reported everyone else who participated in the discussion about sexual assault because they censor bypassed. No one else but me got the IC vio.
almost 9 years

Uranus says

Terry I haven't looked over those other reports but I didn't handle them so accusing me of bias is a bit silly. Your creepy PM's aren't appreciated. I try to be as fair as I can and believe it or not, I don't do every report myself!

The victim complex is very unbecoming by the way!


You could have self-OT'd. You didn't. Trash.