I'm afraid the only job prospects the mods will ever have is being a walmart greeter or maybe even tearing tickets at the movie theaters if they're lucky : )
What if someone mantally handcaped call someone the [redacted] word? Will it be hatefull then?
deleteddeletedover 10 years ago
Remember to not call anyone the r-word, just heavily imply that their mental stature will limit their prospective job outlooks to either bagging groceries or licking stamps for old people for the rest of their miserable lives
2
deleteddeletedover 10 years ago
no but it's pretty hateful towards people with mental handicaps to use the term as an insult. Which is like, the entire point.
Like, you're going to have a way easier time convincing me that certain choice words shouldn't be auto-vios than you will convincing me that the previous exchange wasn't HC.
deleteddeletedover 10 years ago
Harod you have the intelligence of a dune beetle and the breath of a rotting pig
You can question the mental capabilities of anyone and it won't be an auto-vio.
Auto-vios are for the limited slur words alone - if you just use roundabout terms to call them the same or worse it is just a gray area where vios may be handed out based on the nature and intent.
Basically if they don't like you they can use their "discretion" to FK you lmao it's quite sad
deleteddeletedover 10 years ago
There is in fact power in words on this god forsaken forum. God save the queen!
deleteddeletedover 10 years ago
Which isn't an auto vio - I conferred with Solace who confirmed that saying the r-word will be an auto vio - but if you say anything else it is up to the mods discretion based on the nature of it. For instance:
I could very overtly imply the rules were created by a troglodyte, slack jawed, slobbering baboon with such mental stunted growth they resemble a 6 year old and it won't be an auto vio because I did not use the r-word.
