Back to Epicmafia

Suggestion:Mod election system

deletedalmost 10 years

We all know mods are been suggesting by the other mods etc

So what about a new system to elect new moderators A new section in the forums where all moderator applications will be posted and on those applications Epicmafia can vote on so its more fair choosing the mod for epicmafia by the players of epicmafia

So its -1 votes or +1 votes with a reason why you downvote or upvote This will highly stop mods suggesting only friends

A mod should be choosed by the players of epicmafia and not the mods themselves

Current template i thought up

Main account:(Whats your main account)

Alternate accounts:(Your alternate accounts)

Why would you be a good mod(explanition why you be a good mod)

What would you do if three poeple gets into a fight with eachother(explaining how you would handle it)

Do you have any prior experience being a mod?

Did you contribute something to the community

Your timezone:

Langauges you speak(sometimes there are games with other langauges but very uncommonly)

Age:(how old are you in real life)

HEY LOOK A TEMPLATE^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Democracy
57
Democracy
27
Lets the mods choose by themselves
almost 10 years
i've let it stayed this way for too long
deletedalmost 10 years
Tl;dr: Corrupt mods banning too many people/not banning enough people/entertainment factor
almost 10 years
I think it was supposed to be expect*
almost 10 years
because the current system is idiotic
deletedalmost 10 years

Croned says


belovedprincess says

i am gonna explain arrow's impossibility theorem to u noobs. ok, say u have 3 people for election and 100 people voting. 30 vote person A, 30 vote person B, and 40 vote person C. so person C wins and gets elected. the thing is tho, 60 people really don't like person C and if there'd been better coordination in the voting those 30 on A and B each would've teamed up to have someone else elected before him. ergo, voting is broken unless it's completely dynamic. same goes for rank/order, it doesn't fix it being random/blind. successive voting is the only thing that gives u a fair approximation of what people want. that exists easily in plus and unplusses in a forum thread and open discussion


I think you missed the whole "Single Transferable Vote" concept: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l8XOZJkozfI


it's the same thing bro. if it's people getting enough votes, getting elected or not elected, then votes being transferred automatically to secondary candidates, it's still blind. there has to be personal input the whole way along or it's broken. that's what it is, right?
almost 10 years
I don't think the mods are corrupt
deletedalmost 10 years
Can someone summarize for me why we're changing the system at all?
almost 10 years

mist says

i for one except the full support of the anime demographic on epicmafiadotcom, and that alone should be enough. I don't have to appeal to any dirty normies in order to achieve my goals


accept*
almost 10 years

WolfODonnellz says

Nobody talked about my mod app template yet


it's good
almost 10 years

mist says

i for one except the full support of the anime demographic on epicmafiadotcom, and that alone should be enough. I don't have to appeal to any dirty normies in order to achieve my goals


epic post for the win!!!!!!!!!!
deletedalmost 10 years
Nobody talked about my mod app template yet
deletedalmost 10 years
i for one except the full support of the anime demographic on epicmafiadotcom, and that alone should be enough. I don't have to appeal to any dirty normies in order to achieve my goals
deletedalmost 10 years
Telling by the uproar of the community saying "The moderators are corrupt" and the intense amount of appeals and unlawful vios, it seems that the community would be better off selecting moderators through an organized election because the community knows what they want/expect. I, myself, expect a fair moderator that actually takes the reportee and reporter into consideration rather than just the anger or the reporter, or just the sadness of the reportee, or has a bias from any type of friendship. Basically speaking, moderators need to know the game, know the feeling of losing/winning, know what cheaters do/look like, and also are able to have no bias with people they like/dislike. What it seems like from the uproar of the community is that the moderators seem to buddy with buddies, and harshly punish those they dislike. I do see comments on the lobby wall about a moderator's "corruption" or a report that they feel was unfair at least once a day. When to be honest, it shouldn't even be on the lobby wall because moderators should be fair to begin with. It's one thing to have troll reports or grudge reports, but to have legitimate reports also be judged wrongly or harshly is just terrible. Because the community knows what this feels like/knows what's wrong or right, a democratic set up for electing moderators should be appropriate. Also, to further explain, some current mods, for example, may be corrupt. To have those mods be the ones to choose the next mods is kind of bad for the community and epicmafia itself.

(edit) For the record, I don't know what these voting algorithms have to do with anything .-.
deletedalmost 10 years
I'm here to write political campaign songs for you, and arrange a suitable Z-list celebrity to sing it for you, all for just £99 per hour.
deletedalmost 10 years
almost 10 years

belovedprincess says

i am gonna explain arrow's impossibility theorem to u noobs. ok, say u have 3 people for election and 100 people voting. 30 vote person A, 30 vote person B, and 40 vote person C. so person C wins and gets elected. the thing is tho, 60 people really don't like person C and if there'd been better coordination in the voting those 30 on A and B each would've teamed up to have someone else elected before him. ergo, voting is broken unless it's completely dynamic. same goes for rank/order, it doesn't fix it being random/blind. successive voting is the only thing that gives u a fair approximation of what people want. that exists easily in plus and unplusses in a forum thread and open discussion


I think you missed the whole "Single Transferable Vote" concept: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l8XOZJkozfI
almost 10 years

Togepi says

I'm actually excited for the campaign posters that are going to pop up.


I can't wait for people to get reported for their posters.
almost 10 years
ok i watched the video, i can code an STV system
deletedalmost 10 years
i am gonna explain arrow's impossibility theorem to u noobs. ok, say u have 3 people for election and 100 people voting. 30 vote person A, 30 vote person B, and 40 vote person C. so person C wins and gets elected. the thing is tho, 60 people really don't like person C and if there'd been better coordination in the voting those 30 on A and B each would've teamed up to have someone else elected before him. ergo, voting is broken unless it's completely dynamic. same goes for rank/order, it doesn't fix it being random/blind. successive voting is the only thing that gives u a fair approximation of what people want. that exists easily in plus and unplusses in a forum thread and open discussion
almost 10 years
I just ask that you do not use my photos as stock photos for your minorities. Thank you.
deletedalmost 10 years
I'm going to start an online campaign consultancy to help people win EM elections.

*whips out photoshop*

ok I'm going to photoshop some minorities into your photos now to make you look less racist.
almost 10 years

Togepi says


Satan says


Togepi says

I don't care about your campaign until you Photoshop something.


what is a photo shop? is that a store where u buy photos?


...Yes. But it's only in a town called Adobe.


adobe iowa?
almost 10 years

mist says


Togepi says

I don't care about your campaign until you Photoshop something.


if i do will i have your vote?


Depends on how good the Photoshop is tbh. I'm a design junkie.
almost 10 years

Satan says


Togepi says

I don't care about your campaign until you Photoshop something.


what is a photo shop? is that a store where u buy photos?


...Yes. But it's only in a town called Adobe.
deletedalmost 10 years

Togepi says

I don't care about your campaign until you Photoshop something.


if i do will i have your vote?