I want to play closed setups that are moderated for cheating. Whenever I play in sandbox there's nearly always one user who has more than one account in the game.
Alternative idea: Merge Sandbox with Main lobby
Merge
76
No Merge
21
Merge the two lobbies
deletedabout 9 years
Gamethrowing isn't moderated for unranked in main lobby.
I get you but i'm saying merged comp/main created a better place for cheaters. the same would happen in any scenario where more tables are brought into one lobby
Sandbox games aren't moderated (unless for HC or whatever other vio). Granted I don't know the rules too well. But if we combine lobbies won't that mean that closed role games CAN be moderated? And if so, that would mean that people could get vios for game throwing and such. (Again I'm not too knowledgable with the rules or how moderating is done. So i mean if you can see a way past it then maybe I'll change my vote)
P.S. nice new avi
deletedabout 9 years
I also believe a lobby merge would result in sandbox players shifting towards scumhunt-style play and more participants in trophy runs.
dont take away the only place where i wont get bullied because of my autism
deletedabout 9 years
The fact is unranked main lobby games are moderated for cheating and so mods should catch those who cheat in them. The mods have their IP tools and foxiebox or w.e which is enough to catch multiaccounting at the least.
deletedabout 9 years
Also can we add the host role to main lobby? I'd like to play some vivor games that are moderated for cheating. Everyone that plays vivor in the survivor lobby just abuses meta
deletedabout 9 years
It's ridiculous that a legitimate user like myself cannot play a closed setup that's moderated for cheating.
merging sandbox with main lobby (not that it would happen) would make it easier for people to cheat because the tables blend and are harder to watch and spot cheaters
this 100% happened when comp merged with main hence the cheating inv's every round plus all tables having at least one gt alt
