I want to play closed setups that are moderated for cheating. Whenever I play in sandbox there's nearly always one user who has more than one account in the game.
There is literally no benefit to merging the lobbies over just allowing closed role in main.
deletedover 9 years
I really don't think games filling would be a problem. On poker, both the sit&go games and tournament games fill easily despite being in the same lobby.
Or instead of a terrible idea, we could make it so closed setups are allowed in main.
deletedover 9 years
merging sandbox with main lobby (not that it would happen) would make it easier for people to cheat because the tables blend and are harder to watch and spot cheaters
this 100% happened when comp merged with main hence the cheating inv's every round plus all tables having at least one gt alt
The fact is unranked main lobby games are moderated for cheating and so mods should catch those who cheat in them. The mods have their IP tools and foxiebox or w.e which is enough to catch multiaccounting at the least.
I get you but i'm saying merged comp/main created a better place for cheaters. the same would happen in any scenario where more tables are brought into one lobby
You're implying sandbox users would cheat in main lobby games.
no, I'm saying the lobby will become easier for cheaters to go uncaught because we have competitive games grouped with a bunch of other tables brought in from other lobbies. So not enough attention can be given to fullproof any cheating case, and competitive would honestly die
Mods just need to work harder IMO
deletedover 9 years
Percentage wise, the number of caught cheaters didn't go up noticeably with the merge
merging sandbox with main lobby (not that it would happen) would make it easier for people to cheat because the tables blend and are harder to watch and spot cheaters
this 100% happened when comp merged with main hence the cheating inv's every round plus all tables having at least one gt alt
The fact is unranked main lobby games are moderated for cheating and so mods should catch those who cheat in them. The mods have their IP tools and foxiebox or w.e which is enough to catch multiaccounting at the least.
I get you but i'm saying merged comp/main created a better place for cheaters. the same would happen in any scenario where more tables are brought into one lobby
You're implying sandbox users would cheat in main lobby games.
no, I'm saying the lobby will become easier for cheaters to go uncaught because we have competitive games grouped with a bunch of other tables brought in from other lobbies. So not enough attention can be given to fullproof any cheating case, and competitive would honestly die
I've contacted Lucid, the outcome will probably be decided on the number of votes in the poll
what happens if it's a tie
Imagine, the fate of the two lobbies, decided in a coin toss.
deletedover 9 years
Percentage wise, the number of caught cheaters didn't go up noticeably with the merge
deletedover 9 years
merging sandbox with main lobby (not that it would happen) would make it easier for people to cheat because the tables blend and are harder to watch and spot cheaters
this 100% happened when comp merged with main hence the cheating inv's every round plus all tables having at least one gt alt
The fact is unranked main lobby games are moderated for cheating and so mods should catch those who cheat in them. The mods have their IP tools and foxiebox or w.e which is enough to catch multiaccounting at the least.
I get you but i'm saying merged comp/main created a better place for cheaters. the same would happen in any scenario where more tables are brought into one lobby
You're implying sandbox users would cheat in main lobby games.