From the games I've looked at so far (about 1/4 of them) there's a pattern where Zwink always votes at the start of the day and CocaCola blindly sheeps it, usually in through a lynch. Especially if they're both town. CocaCola never seems to misread Zwink from what I've seen.
They also continually talk about "carrying each other" and trophying together and that sort of thing.
I started on a pastebin for them but my power went out and I lost it so this is all U guys get.
well you didn't post anything worthwhile on the piratepad, which was the de-facto staging area for that cheating investigation, so you can see why i'd assume you didn't have a secret pastebin that supported your opinion that you just decided not to share with the class.
From the games I've looked at so far (about 1/4 of them) there's a pattern where Zwink always votes at the start of the day and CocaCola blindly sheeps it, usually in through a lynch. Especially if they're both town. CocaCola never seems to misread Zwink from what I've seen.
not that i was there, but just because he didn't write stuff down doesn't mean he didn't read the games.
in my experience when you go through the trouble to read ALL the games in service to the mod team, but end up not actually writing anything, it's because you don't really feel you have anything good enough to write. i've experienced this myself when i don't write pastebins
deletedover 9 years
i guess jasper just didn't deem your "i think they're cheating" to be all that pithy.
fine *wasn't enough evidence of role sharing. it was a while ago
mild to moderate meta abuse, yes. this zwink stuff isn't meta abuse it's systematic throwing, as devante pointed out
and i assure you everything worthwhile about the case was communicated to me. i guess jasper just didn't deem your "i think they're cheating" to be all that pithy.
that's not what i remember from the pirate pad. it was just a big 'ol wall-of-me going through their games alongside riot's analysis and explaining how there was no rolesharing.
i just find it funny that arcbell, who thought two users that were friends and coordinated to play games together and won every game they did should not get cheating, says two users who did not coordinate to play games together and were not friends and naturally developed a way of playing a setup (everyone voting one person as a reaction test) should
if you'd actually read the games closely yourself instead of taking riot's word for it and lazily voting to ban them you'd know these cases are nothing alike.
reminder that the only reason i was involved in that case at all was because none of the mods were up to the task of reading the games and making their own content...
that's funny seeing as I read every game and all the other evidence, and so did you. And I agree that they are nothing alike, as prevail was actually cheating.
And no I'm pretty sure the only reason you were involved in that case was because you involved yourself in it
i just find it funny that arcbell, who thought two users that were friends and coordinated to play games together and won every game they did should not get cheating, says two users who did not coordinate to play games together and were not friends and naturally developed a way of playing a setup (everyone voting one person as a reaction test) should
if you'd actually read the games closely yourself instead of taking riot's word for it and lazily voting to ban them you'd know these cases are nothing alike.
reminder that the only reason i was involved in that case at all was because none of the mods were up to the task of reading the games and making their own content...