sorry that you blew your one shot to get re-modded by writing a crappy pastebin. i hope you don't write another essay about how not worth it modding is to damage control how badly you wanted this.
deletedover 9 years
no i just dodged you since you suck lol
i like justrec
i've no opinion of the man as a person, i'm talking ab him as a mafia player TBH (to be hunky)
i know, i like him as a mafia player
deletedover 9 years
moreover, who cares how many games there are. they could've cheated in just one game and that's enough for a cheating vio. i showed what i believe to be (and had multiple people agree with me on) convincing evidence. the way i see it, i've already done the legwork for mods to ban a cheater, but if billstickers is posting here, the ship has sailed.
this isn't true and you know it, and i'm mostly just posting openly because no one's been around to discuss it with except for pereking
it's nice to see that you not only can fail to ban a cheater without doing any work yourself, but you also fail to ban a cheater with someone else doing the work. best mod?
deletedover 9 years
slow if they were role sharing why would he reaction test that guy instead of just investigating him for real?
deletedover 9 years
Slow's pastebin is sorta like that Tom Brady investigation, just a bunch of circumstantial evidence leading to the conclusion: It's more probable than not that he cheated just cuz
it's not even circumstantial it's just like a blatant misrepresentation of facts ie the game where markus "outs a guilty on last maf when he has a NV on bg. he never retracts it until mafia self hammers" without accounting for the fact that the entire day took 40 seconds and the guy self hammered 3 seconds after the last town voted him
it's like i said later on in the paragraph "calls it a reaction test" or something wacky like that.
it *was* a reaction test, and the guy failed so quickly the game ended
i've no opinion of the man as a person, i'm talking ab him as a mafia player TBH (to be hunky)
deletedover 9 years
Slow's pastebin is sorta like that Tom Brady investigation, just a bunch of circumstantial evidence leading to the conclusion: It's more probable than not that he cheated just cuz
it's not even circumstantial it's just like a blatant misrepresentation of facts ie the game where markus "outs a guilty on last maf when he has a NV on bg. he never retracts it until mafia self hammers" without accounting for the fact that the entire day took 40 seconds and the guy self hammered 3 seconds after the last town voted him
it's like i said later on in the paragraph "calls it a reaction test" or something wacky like that.
i do believe that 3 of the games in the bin show friend bias but i don't think we could pick apart a single runner's round in any round without some example of someone deferring to their running friend on a ML or preventing their friend from dying n1
and if we're suspending him for games that suggest friend bias we should probably suspend espeon too tbh.
and soda17 and zhourgh and giga and jazz and bearguru and almost every other runner
i don't have friends idiot
deletedover 9 years
Pretty much.
deletedover 9 years
if you want to get away with cheating have one of your friends do the pastebin on you and everyone will just use it as a frame of reference because no one wants to make another one
deletedover 9 years
To be fair, it's also possible to make people who did cheat look innocent.
An incompetent investigation into an actual cheater, when someone made the right conclusion for all the wrong reasons, and you look over it and just see how dumb they've been, is a great way to get away with cheating.
deletedover 9 years
why do you want to make a pastebin on players you think didn't cheat
i probs wouldn't, i'm just making the point that it's possible to make it look like people who didn't cheat did in a pastebin.
deletedover 9 years
*sweats* n-no ofc not pfft
deletedover 9 years
why do you want to make a pastebin on players you think didn't cheat