most people who are policy lynched usually fall under being town to some extent but their playstyle or actions are so adherent to the game that you dont care and would rather take the chance of you being wrong about it and getting rid of them
actually, by intentionally lynching town [you do not believe is a liability] is actually playing against your win condition, and intentionally doing so is playing against your win condition. just because on the next day he stopped playing against his win condition and started playing for his win condition, does not invalidate the fact that he was playing against his win condition on the previous. QED his actions were violation worthy.
deletedabout 10 years
You can lynch people you think are town whilst still playing to win the game, though.
deletedabout 10 years
he said, objectively, that he thought Connor was town. ergo he was not playing to win by voting him ergo he was game friggin tossing
deletedabout 10 years
Only person who deletes accounts and has logs of screenshots like that is Eris. I'd be careful what you wish for if you want him PM'ing you, before one of them has more than just screenshots in. ;)
it's not difficult to read a game objectively and understand or recognise someone's intent and actions with said game. these things are not difficult concepts
deletedabout 10 years
based on dislike despite townreading him and then claiming after the game that he thought connor was town so that would fall under grudge
it was bad play on his part but i don't think it was inherently gamethrowing as he had reason to why he hammered you, even if said 'to teach you a lesson' can be sorely put out of context of things
he was teaching you a lesson by disobeying him, which falls under a game-related action and isn't a grudge/GT