uh no, its pretty obvious im not the only one who wants it, i only want jan 2.0 comped this round. im just defending rose who WANTS the setup comped and EARNED THE RIGHT to comp a setup. nice potshot though.
Anthony likes using the past as leverage for why we should do things now
We hung black people in the past..........
(I'm not advocating it Connor idiot)
deletedabout 10 years
People Choose to play third party setups. There's no such as "not fair N1 roullette" unless all 6 setups were third party setups. You don't accidentally join games with killer/fool in.
it's not fair to other runners who play on setups that require scumhunting, like Voltron Doesn't Like Indians
VDLI and Manhunt can both be played? Nobody forces those other runners to join Manhunt, and Manhunt does not dominate rounds.
deletedabout 10 years
u know, arcbell and i tried to come up with a theoretically optimal win-chance-spread for a three-party setup and we got nothin.
to clarify, an example of a theoretically optimal win-chance-spread for a two-party setup is 50/50
you guys are acting like this is a periodic thing. the last time fgm was comped was, again, almost two years ago. just let it be comped every once in awhile. a lot of people gave lluren s*** about comping it, but the mods didnt do anything about it.
This was two years ago. Now, it's not two years ago. It shouldn't be competitive. You don't need a Round with it comped to play it or to be satisfied. Why do you want a horrible round with a horrible setup being played the most
because i cant run next round and i want fgm and jan 2.0 comped so that i dont have to worry about jan being comped the round i can run. and fgm is fun
So you don't want what's fair for the site because you can't run next round for a trophy that you probably won't win, ok
deletedabout 10 years
maybe you should accept that you are fighting for the comping of bad setups, friend.