Back to Epicmafia

Lucid Please Read

about 10 years

Randomizing (?) mafia order of actions was a bad idea. It seems now that mafia cannot strategize who leads on a kill, which makes it harder in many setups to play optimally and unfairly gives town an advantage, especially in setups containing bomb/watcher where mafia can easily get into autoloss. Please go back to first mafia to vote leads.

Example: https://epicmafia.com/game/3471828/review I vote second, get caught by watcher

Revert back to mafia being able to choose who leads instead of random.
53
Yes
4
No
about 10 years
So much for lucid coming back last weekend
about 10 years
wtf? why was this added.. it ruins a ton of good setups... lucid cmon
deletedabout 10 years
just played an awful game where stalker lead and GF died instead zzzz
about 10 years
PLEASE FIX THIS ITS KILLING MEEEEE
about 10 years
i wonder why was this even changed. it should always be the first visitor on the report. if it isnt then the whole point of mafia meeting is moot. and all the strategies are thrown out. i hope lucid gives a read to this. we need to revert back to the original
about 10 years

TheShane says

When the heck did runwithfire become mod.


on her own whim, as usual
about 10 years
When the heck did runwithfire become mod.
about 10 years

catbae says

also lucid please read: give me my tokens

about 10 years

ark says

I say we randomize role actions, e.g nilla can save, blue can explode and lynching last maf can count as a fool situation imo.



^ make this an unranked game option pls. This is more important
about 10 years
I say we randomize role actions, e.g nilla can save, blue can explode and lynching last maf can count as a fool situation imo.
about 10 years
Yeah there's no reason to add more luck based mechs to the game, especially considering all the setups made already were based on the previous way things worked.

It's how it happens in forum mafia (at least where I have played it). It wouldn't be as big of a deal if EM was made this way, but changing it now will make all setup statistics inaccurate.
about 10 years

400000 says

no LOLUMAD

as the example in the OP shows harrold voted first i voted second and there were no switching votes, also watcher had picked his target before mafia voted.


lmao thats not lolumad


anyways...

this is clearly not right. lucid polease change it back this is like one of the things that has been a part of the mechanics of the game since forever and i can't see why it would ever change
deletedabout 10 years
cos if u stalk then u get watched
deletedabout 10 years
Only noobs mech-test.
about 10 years
also it's "choosing" ;)
about 10 years
why would voting my stalker meeting first make me catchable by watcher if i'm voting second on the dead...it's never been like that
deletedabout 10 years
It's voting, dumbass.
about 10 years
that's my stalker meeting noob
deletedabout 10 years

400000 says

no LOLUMAD

as the example in the OP shows harrold voted first i voted second and there were no switching votes, also watcher had picked his target before mafia voted.


Bioshock1990 votes Killnoone
400000 chooses williamhill
deletedabout 10 years
Kittenz was the hooker is now even more absurdly townsided.
about 10 years
also lucid please read: give me my tokens
about 10 years
that's actually absurdly unfair in setups with a janitor, leads to potentially catching multiple mafia
about 10 years
Oh man that's awesome that he did that.
about 10 years
no LOLUMAD

as the example in the OP shows harrold voted first i voted second and there were no switching votes, also watcher had picked his target before mafia voted.
deletedabout 10 years
Lucid please read

Goodbar's wrong