would u state the obvious if it was girallon
experience with a player != personal affiliation. i know how a lot of players play without knowing them. retti u dumb
deleted over 10 years
Im not sour. Im stating the obvious.
Gotcha okay, I appreciate you clearing that up - when I read "personal affiliation" I got the vibe you handled it because he's your friend. Sorry for that. I've never seen personal affiliation used in that way before so it jumped out at me.
man sachy is sour towards retti
Itter says thebrontosaurus says Itter says which is exactly what goodbar did too + it was obvious you meant that
idk why youre attacking retti like that
deleted over 10 years
Itter says more professional
Itter says lol
deleted over 10 years
thebrontosaurus says Itter says i took giving a no violation to bear last night based on my personal experience with him and knowing how he plays the game, and i knew that his vote was a means of a reaction test and not a gamethrow
deleted over 10 years
i don't really care @venus
Itter says How do you mean, "personal affiliation"? Be careful with how you phrase things here, Retti.
deleted over 10 years
Yet saying that on a open forum is completely unprofessional.
deleted over 10 years
Venus says Itter says thebrontosaurus says Itter says above a star behind my name i'm still a person who has his own opinions and i won't pretend that i don't dislike him
deleted over 10 years
no, i don't take personal affiliation to mind when it comes to reports unless it's relevant (e.g bear's report last night)
deleted over 10 years
Itter says thebrontosaurus says Itter says how professional
thebrontosaurus says obviously it wont
You don't have to, I just hope that doesn't affect how you moderate any reports involving Prevail.
deleted over 10 years
thebrontosaurus says Itter says nah i think it's fine, i don't like prevail on a personal level is all
deleted over 10 years
but him being unbanned if he's served his time isn't much of an issue, it's not like you have to actively play games with him if you don't want to
Itter says Not a bannable offense, but I could see why that'd make people uneasy.
deleted over 10 years
prevail lied about cancer and was a male
Peta says Peta says I don't know enough about the site's history to really say. Most of the people who cheated around that time cheated before I even joined the site, so everything I hear is second hand and probably somewhat biased, both for and against. She served the time so she'll be unbanned.
What did I point to as my main reason, again?
thebrontosaurus says Peta says But do you know of any players for whom this description is roughly accurate?
Peta says Please answer this question, bronto. I'm not particularly dismayed by your decision but you just pointed to this as your main reason for it unless you can back it up you're going to have to do better.
