would u state the obvious if it was girallon
experience with a player != personal affiliation. i know how a lot of players play without knowing them. retti u dumb
Im not sour. Im stating the obvious.
Gotcha okay, I appreciate you clearing that up - when I read "personal affiliation" I got the vibe you handled it because he's your friend. Sorry for that. I've never seen personal affiliation used in that way before so it jumped out at me.
man sachy is sour towards retti
Itter thebrontosaurus Itter no, i don't take personal affiliation to mind when it comes to reports unless it's relevant (e.g bear's report last night) which is exactly what goodbar did too + it was obvious you meant that
idk why youre attacking retti like that
thebrontosaurus Itter no, i don't take personal affiliation to mind when it comes to reports unless it's relevant (e.g bear's report last night) i took giving a no violation to bear last night based on my personal experience with him and knowing how he plays the game, and i knew that his vote was a means of a reaction test and not a gamethrow
i don't really care @venus
Itter no, i don't take personal affiliation to mind when it comes to reports unless it's relevant (e.g bear's report last night) How do you mean, "personal affiliation"? Be careful with how you phrase things here, Retti.
Yet saying that on a open forum is completely unprofessional.
Venus Itter thebrontosaurus Itter prevail lied about cancer and was a male above a star behind my name i'm still a person who has his own opinions and i won't pretend that i don't dislike him
no, i don't take personal affiliation to mind when it comes to reports unless it's relevant (e.g bear's report last night)
You don't have to, I just hope that doesn't affect how you moderate any reports involving Prevail.
thebrontosaurus Itter prevail lied about cancer and was a male nah i think it's fine, i don't like prevail on a personal level is all
but him being unbanned if he's served his time isn't much of an issue, it's not like you have to actively play games with him if you don't want to
Itter prevail lied about cancer and was a male Not a bannable offense, but I could see why that'd make people uneasy.
prevail lied about cancer and was a male
Peta Peta Name a user who's (a) cheated for two or more trophies, (b) extensively ban-evaded, (c) been unbanned, and (d) reformed. I don't know enough about the site's history to really say. Most of the people who cheated around that time cheated before I even joined the site, so everything I hear is second hand and probably somewhat biased, both for and against. She served the time so she'll be unbanned.
What did I point to as my main reason, again?
thebrontosaurus Peta Name a user who's (a) cheated for two or more trophies, (b) extensively ban-evaded, (c) been unbanned, and (d) reformed. But do you know of any players for whom this description is roughly accurate?
Peta Name a user who's (a) cheated for two or more trophies, (b) extensively ban-evaded, (c) been unbanned, and (d) reformed. Please answer this question, bronto. I'm not particularly dismayed by your decision but you just pointed to this as your main reason for it unless you can back it up you're going to have to do better.
