Clearly gamethrowing doesn't require intent if you can get gamethrowing violations by playing to win.
If you're playing with townies that are adamant on lynching the uncc'd doc, how is it gamethrowing to let them during a ml? If the only people in the table that didn't vote the doc are 2 PRs and a mafia, a consensus has been met, especially in light of the fact that the only person that even attempted to prevent the lynch was the clear that allowed the BW to start in the first place.
The only reason I didn't hammer in that game was because you were in it, being complicit with soda doing the very thing you've been giving me violations for.
You spend too much time doing reports to not recognize a pattern. Since you can't actually lose a game because of a ml, I can't throw a game in which town decides to forgo playing the game to lynch me every time I roll PR with soda. "with soda" being the opportune pattern you're choosing to neglect. If people can use soda grudge voting me as an excuse forgo playing the game, why do I have argue against this as if it's related to the game being thrown against me?
You're trying to make me complicit in being thrown against by fighting a baseless wagon. If I was doing this in spite of people trying to play normally, you'd have a case. The last 2 times this happened the lynches took under 20 seconds because they could, and instead of playing with people willing to forgo playing to jump on a wagon, why not let me self vote the ml away so I can play another game?
Yet you refuse to answer how within the scope of the rules or the context of the game, I was playing or trying to lose. You're literally blaming me because the two townies that voted to kill me died for it.
Everything else you've said is either irrelevant or works in my favor which is why you're getting frustrated.
look dude, concepts are simple and logic isnt hard. i have no obligation to sit here and explain to you how stupid you're being so im gonna bounce. Pce dude
You're also trying to revise the fact that it's impossible to lose the game during a ml, the loss was the result of 2 townies that voted to kill the doc instead of unvoting the doc and there's no revision for that.
he wasnt voting when you voted so it doesnt matter what he voted before!!!!!!! you fool!!!!!!!!!!!!! nincompoop!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! baffoon!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I thought I was, doesn't change the fact that despite my self vote no one reacted or tried to stop it. Also your BS about the future doesn't exclude the fact that the guy that voted to hammer me had already been voted me before my self vote.The point of the self vote was to get B, but it's obvious B wasn't going to happen based on the votes and reactions after I claimed.
