Clearly gamethrowing doesn't require intent if you can get gamethrowing violations by playing to win.
If you're playing with townies that are adamant on lynching the uncc'd doc, how is it gamethrowing to let them during a ml? If the only people in the table that didn't vote the doc are 2 PRs and a mafia, a consensus has been met, especially in light of the fact that the only person that even attempted to prevent the lynch was the clear that allowed the BW to start in the first place.
I don't imagine you guys are too good at math. Even if I had voted no one, the votes left up would have resulted in my lynch. Taking out destructive townies with a ml, including myself and an incompetent cop that allowed the BW to form on me in the first place is EXACTLY playing to win and we would have lost the game for the EXACT same reason.
Since you were the same halfarse'd moderator as Charley
You would think that in 6 million games of mafia played on this site, someone that see's the uncc'd doc self vote would hesitate to ml them.
I didn't hammer myself. There was over a minute before I voted myself and someone else choose to hammer, but that minute wasn't spent trying to get the vote off the uncc'd doc, which if it had been then I wouldn't have been lynched.
To your second point Jeff, I stated D1 using the ml was the best course forward, hence putting the vote on myself. If any one of the towns voting to ml me were paying attention or being competent I would have flipped the lynch to the stalker for being so blatant, but with the incompetence being shown. The reason we actually lost the game was because of Soda in the last day, and the actions of a townie that voted to hammer me.
I think in this case you made it clear with a self hammer that your intention to win was gone. You can argue you didn't go in with intent to lose but you know full well you were no longer playing to win.
