she wouldn't normally have to out the vest, and I don't think she was considering how the vest and hooked claim would look to Kamari

maybe suboptimal play - but moreso just seems like she was not expecting to be shot, since everyone else was saying to shoot the other claim

i hadn't really thought i had a reason to out the vest seeing as i assumed you would shoot either for two, or guilty test

you can't know if i didn't claim the vest "on purpose" bc you're not me and i'm telling you i simply didn't think i had to bc i didn't think you would shoot me

i wasn't even actively hiding the vest either

also my gts tend to be more obvious ngl

you're also assuming that i knew your thought process (you not being vested means cop is likely not hooked) which is giving me way too much credit. i'm not psychic or even

i assumed you would be shooting for two as would be optimal.

there is no reason to assume i was gting here and i'm outright telling you i wasn't and i wouldn't bother writing an essay in comments section if i did

this was isp / negligence at most. yeah i should have outed the vest but there was no intent to throw and you have no evidence there was other than assuming i'm psychic and have perfect knowledge of strategy

He purposely did not claim the vest.

If he was real cop, his vest would've been hit at night regardless of whether he hid it or not.

There was ZERO reason to hide the vest unless they were purposely throwing and trying to waste he ml.

>Claims hooked cop.
>Knows that the sheriff was not vested.
>Does not out vest
>Wastes the ml (gun) on the vest because he did not out.


Sheriff gets vest n1. If cop claims hooked and sheriff has no vest they are automatically scum.
Space knew I was shooting in cops.

If he claimed to have been vested, they would've been 90% clear.

kamari also didn't say they were gonna shoot me and i had no reason to think they would (instead of going for other cop for two or guilty testing)

this is 0% gamethrow, you can call me stupid for not outing vest but there was no intent to throw. you also shot suboptimally and refused to reconsider the lynch because you were certain it would get refunded (it won't), so you're also to blame for the loss

i assumed kamari would shoot for two as would be optimal instead of trying to go for the other cop. it wasn't in any way gt, suboptimal play / isp at most. there is no indication of me playing to lose