Slander is mean, I’ll let that pass but I’m serious about the next time

calling you misogynistic isn't mean, it's true

I’m not gonna die over an epic mafia vio, but if I get any negative comments pointed my wah from lace I’ll be reporting & shoopie I expect the same energy

I wasn't trying to jump on anyone's side, just merely providing my opinion on the semantics of the rules and info present. I apologize if it appeared as anything else.

It's not a note. It will never be a note.

Ok I’ve bloxked Lacey on the forums if she refers to any of my posts & calls me anything mean (misogynistic or gross etc) I’ll be reporting her and citing this report lol

(Here is me announcing her block)

Now lacey, do you see why calling me disgusting was not productive?

vv that was @ devante's comment from forever ago "Whoa whoa at best that’s a note for harassment" i just forgot to hit post and din't refresh to see y'all had moved on my b

how is it a note lmao i blocked you, said on the forums that it was nice to have you blocked so you knew i did, mentioned being autistic in this comment, you made a joke about autism, and then started defending it because "it's not offensive it's like saying ______ or _________" (lol ok). you know what you did, you linked the report on the forums because you were proud you got under someone's skin with your nastiness, stop spending all day trying to pretend you didn't do it. this is gross

Yes, because if he were to continue harassing her in the future (but not using slurs) it should stack with this current vio. As HC it would only be harassment 1st the next time.

With everything lacey said and then you wrote what you did in the report. Yeah I'm bumping this to Harassment 1st.

I can't speak to any of that lacey because that wasn't in the report, but I can tell you that Shoopie cited her sole reason for vio'ing him as his narcissism joke after calling you rtarded.

With that extra information (you blocking him) that is pretty blatant harassment and makes me question why he should get the lesser, different vio.

Reading what lacey just said constitutes a harassment vio.

Whoa whoa at best that’s a note for harassment

i blocked him on the forums and mentioned being autistic and he decided that was an appropriate time to make a joke about my disability and then go to the forums to link it like a trophy for everyone to see how offensive he is......... that's pretty fu/cking excessive......

Thats the problem with the HC rule.

Everyone has a different opinion on what constitutes excessive.

And bear in mind this is coming from my stance that his narcissism joke was not severe or excessive.

Why are we making bad precedents instead of giving the most applicable vios?

I'm curious if this out of concern or for arguments sake.

Equally accurate?

They are both accurate.

Oh, so now we're warping the rules to give players lesser vios? Why not give the one that is more accurate instead of creating sh!tty precedents?

lacey it's funny that you think Thalia's argument and my argument are anything but almost identical. You were outright refusing to acknowledge that I might actually be arguing the specifics of the HC rule and not defending Devante.

I have given multiple serious discussions.
If he wants the harsher vio he can appeal for it. I saw how it could be HC and Harrassment and chose to go with the lesser vio.

it's absolutely disgusting that you're still defending this like that devante lmao holy