Yes. The only potential argument I see here is one for harassment. But of course Shoopie is too hurt by dissenting opinions that she can't even give that a serious discussion.

She wrote she was autistic in a report about hateful comments.

Then, with the fight about the report between them he writes what he wrote.
There was animosity between them and what he wrote was clearly disrespecting her discomfort. You don't think its HC? Call it Harassment. She asked you to stop with the report and you did it anyways.

Just passing through.

lacey I would state again how his comment here was not a joke about autism, but since you refused to address it previously I'm not sure you would actually address it this time.

It's actually kind of funny how you like to argue. Ignore the dissenting arguments to your point, start arguing about something else, and then return back to your earlier point as if it had never been countered.

Jesus Christ you’re stupid .

Mentioning the word autism in a joke doesn’t instantly make it hurtful, much like mentioning black or gay in a joke doesn’t instantly make it hurtful


Ie “ I didn’t get the updated black user list of 2018” or “I didn’t get the updated gay list of 2018”

Does not hurt anyone

Stop playing victim

no but a joke about autism is a joke about autism and it's nasty that someone has to explain this to you two. have fun jerking each other off about how mentioning autism in a hurtful way is totally not the same as mentioning autism in a hurtful way, i'm going to work :)

There is just no way his narcissism joke is "severe or excessive" as Shoopie insists.

A joke about narcissism is not a joke about autism.

The only context under which this would be a vio would be if this was a repeated occurrence after you asked him to stop, in which a harassment vio would be considered.

lacey you seem to be missing the idea that the only joke which was targeted at autism/intelligence was his use of rtarded that you originally reported him for, a use that Shoopie herself said was not a vio.

Yeah..... you’re incapable of reading

definitely had no way of knowing lol

lacey 20m 23s
" as I had no way know of knowing you had that" really bc i said it in the report and countless other times on this website dude


I’m only replying to this :

I’ve been back on the site for like 3-5 weeks, if u can find any thread we have both conversed inwhere you mentioned it then you can play this victim card you’re currently attempting .

I didn’t know you had autism, get over yourself

"awkwardly literal bullet points"

It's called logic; you should try it sometime.

once again, if you're taking me saying the way you're defending this is disgusting as an "emotional attack" and you have to break it down into such awkwardly literal bullet points, that's on you. maybe you should try not defending someone who was going out of their way to be gross next time idk

- Disgust is an emotion

- Disgust is the sole way in which you two are judging my argument

- You two are judging my argument solely by emotion.


It's simple logic guys, cmon.

I know basically nothing about Devante and so my only points of reference are the screenshots and statements in this report. This could be anyone that got vio'd and my stance would remain the same. It's called being unbiased.

if you think being told the way you're defending this is gross is an emotional attack then that's on you dud e

translation: i would deconstruct it logically, but i'm too busy doing other sh/it that doesn't involve talking to one of the disgusting edgelords on this website who thinks this is acceptable and that i'm shocked can type with their head so far up devante's as/s trying to find a way to defend him saying this as if it wasn't very obvious that he was doing it on purpose

Translation: I would deconstruct it logically, but I'm too busy making emotional attacks.

i would but you've made it obvious that it's not worth the effort since you're gross

If you think my argument is wrong, deconstruct it logically. Emotional attacks aren't going to get you anywhere.

in other words, you're disgusting

In other words, if the joke was "autistic people don't understand sarcasm" and you swapped in "gay" for "autism", it wouldn't make sense as a joke. If you swap in any other word for for Devante's joke (gay, short, tall) it becomes "Sorry didn’t get the updated [word] list for 2018, won’t happen again boss", which would be applicable to any situation in which someone is making a joke about someone else thinking everyone knows a particular fact about them.

considering the fact that he didn't mention autism in the comment that i reported him for and he hadn't mentioned it period until my report in which i said that it offended me because of that, it's pretty hard for me to believe that he "didn't know" and "wasn't doing it on purpose" or "was making a joke about __________" but i hope you feel good about yourself being so far up his a/ss over something this gross??

good joke, not offensive at all, not doubling down on his disgusting ableism, he definitely had no idea that i have autism despite the fact that i said it right there and he literally referenced it right there

It was a joke about her narcissism, not her autism. Here, I'll lay it out for you:

- lacey reports Devante for calling her a rtard, citing the fact that she is "openly autistic"
- Devante, seeing that what he said does not constitute a vio (as you agreed) and that this whole report is a joke since it is reasonable for him to not be aware of lacey being "openly autistic", makes a joke about her narcissism blinding her to the fact that her autism isn't as "open" as she'd like to believe.
- You give him a vio thinking that he was making a jab at the fact that she has autism.

In this report and Devante's joke you can swap out "autism" for anything else and that joke holds the same exact meaning. This property would not apply if the joke was specifically about autism.

You're honestly not fit to mod if you're going to throw a tantrum and leave before logically deconstructing your reasoning for a vio.

" as I had no way know of knowing you had that" really bc i said it in the report and countless other times on this website dude