https://epicmafia.com/game/4545636/review This game I think that the uncc'd journalist is mafia on day 2. Had I been sheriff I would have lynched him. I even wanted his inno lynched because I scumread her. I was pushing on the 2 "clears". Had I been sheriff I guarantee I would have lynched them both. No wek in this game.

https://epicmafia.com/game/4547819/review This game I claim oracle as blue (I do a lot on warble actually, I could link to several more games) and I lead town as blue while going uncc'd until day 2 where our "cop" who is being lynched claims oracle. I go on to win this game.

https://epicmafia.com/game/4540133/review This game I have to hammer in 2 isp players. I say "I know both mafia" and ask for a cross. (lmao i got made fun of for it after) I hammer in isp based on 1 scummy action. When I'm hammering in isp players I look for the smallest sign of scum and then I stick with it, even if I'm wrong.


I always act on my gut, and I stick with it.

I also just re-read the game where wek was sheriff (the game veg'd) and if anything the journalist GT'd that game. He had a report confirming real cop and he decided to hide. Had he outed it, it woulda been near autowin for town. Instead he hid and ended up being shot (honestly a terrible shot but thats besides the point)

I think I've made my point, and I'm not gunna keep rambling... If the mods have any questions for me they can message me, otherwise I'm going to assume this is closed.

in regards to your last comment bc idk what sheriff game you're on about:

04:30 codes: sorry sorry I went to get water
04:35 codes: oh did wek guilty me

i don't see how jacob was aggressive and i'm sure people are going to say i'm favouring jacob because he's my friend, but this is ridiculous and based off gameplay, it doesn't suggest that jacob and wek are communicating on any other social media site in order to get reads. if you show me other games where they've 'cheated', i can probably show you where jacob got his reads from and why he did what he did.

jacob has an aggressive play style (i've played more than 11 games with him excluding comp this round, so i know his playstyle) i see no way how that's aggressive. he didn't swear, yell, or get frustrated. he wanted codes to hammer on wek because if wek is legit, then town would get TWO mafs versus what we would get if you guilty test which is one maf, and another possible maf who could've bussed.

1. n1: absolutely no codes were given out. d1: he was still fighting the lynch when codes hammered on him at 05:17, his last sentence was at 05:11. i doubt he thought codes would hammer him and that he would overturn to jacob instead which is probably why he didn't out and messed up game for maf.

2. i have 2-3 games as lawyer/jan where i was bussed hard by my maf partner or vice versa, gotten lynched/vice versa + got cop lynched the day after and won the game as maf each time. this is one example: https://epicmafia.com/game/4547739/review

i'm appalled by this because i've played more games with jacob and yet i'm not cheating with him but you're accusing Wektorious of it... i'm a much better contender to be cheating with him rather than Wektorious tho? i've played 11 games with him while he has played 4. don't u think if jacob is cheating, jacob would be smart and cheat in a smarter way AND with someone who will help him win constantly rather than 4 stupid games? good god

Also the game where codes fake afk'd, he said he was afk but somehow he knew he was guiltyd? I thought it was a planned bus, and even thought that up until now. I just reviewed it and apparently it wasn't but whatever

Alright I've been watching this report since it does kinda directly involve me and I just wanna say how stupid it is to accuse me of cheating with someone I've played 4 games with. I can logically explain anything you try to accuse me of here... I doc'd on him n1 in my first game with him? Ok so? I thought he might be n1'd because he had a decent pie but wasnt a "known" player that'd normally have doc on them.

The sheriff game u are talking about I actually remember cuz it was so funny. He hipfired outside cops and hit journalist, but the game veg'd anyways. If I was cheating you think I would be as blatant to have that person shoot the journalist like that? LMAO.

I'm sorry but I'm not gunna let myself go undefended here. I've played with a different group of players every night, and your accusation .

I actually think this might be cheating rather than just throwing because when Jacob was cop and Wektorious was jan, Jacob immediately checked him, but when Codes came back from his AFK after being guiltied, he said "Oh, Wektorious guiltied me?" and I thought he was softing PR before hammering (which is what anyone would assume, I believe) but Jacob was immediately like "yes, how did you know?" and he was really aggressive about it like he KNEW Wektorious was bussing his partner. I don't have much and I don't think 4 games is enough for a pastebin but I think this was most certainly intentional.

Check the game in which Wektorious was sheriff, the cop had a guilty on him and BigFootPlays was softing journalist and confirming the cop's report, but Wektorious shot him instead. I think this is pretty blatant actually.

It's also important to point out Wektorious had 6 games at the time of this report (4 complete, 2 incomplete) and EVERY single one of them were with Jacob. Check their first game together, Wektorious was cop and Jacob was ~miraculously~ on him, when they say they haven't played together before and they don't know each other. Definitely worth looking into.

hey i was just in a game with wek and he linked me to this report so i just wanna say that i wouldnt want someone to throw for me. ive been in the top 3 all round and ive never played with this dude before tonight. tbh idc what the result of the gt report is but i dont want my name dragged into it thx!

1) First time playing mafia on that setup, and I thought I was supposed to CC. I misinterpreted what codes said N1. My bad.

2) Bussing is a pretty common strategy. I don't think I have to explain this.