LOL - Megs negged me. Sorry I did it like that, but when I see a win up for grabs I can't just not take it, that would be stupid.

<3, sup sexy lips :P

+k for being a +k kinda gal

-k for -k'ing for a justified suicide

oh i know, sorry for drawing it out...

I've been around :O

im sorrrrry. i know you dont find it funny, but i found it funny to spec that now =/

Sorry to say I'm not very simple at all, you just failed. claiming a PR as blue is the simple way out of getting lynched, you made us lose by doing that possibly

if you had died, I wouldn't have tunneled on you. That was a big scenario I was thinking of, your way seemed more logical, but mine seemed more right. Because really, claiming blue when a partner epic fails at claiming a PR would be what a maf does, and it'd make it obvious if after a while that partner claims, and imediately incriminate you both.

Horse is right about you though, you do not know how to think outside your own head, you think you HAVE to be right, you think that everyone that disagrees with you is stupid, maybe instead of admitting you're a bitch, try to stop being one. You're a big one. Kthx, a loss doesn't really effect me as much, I'm on a pretty good role lately with winning, so I could care less.

Awww man Eritas still has 5 hearts :(

Rooting for you on your trophy run! :)

Dumbasses, LOL

I promise to fuck up badly at a later stage. Good luck.

yeah, as long as joole doesn't have a perfect day. I cannot believe he's on 800 without using a single heart today. O_o

hey, thanks for sticking up with me with the kick last game. I'm really starting to despise my internet. D:

long story short: "learn to play, lesbian"

except that's the part where you replace lesbian with your own name.

Or take a logic class.

again, the logic can be filed simply as such

bga: my partner wont change (presumably votes, not pants)

people voting bga: you and insti

people who tried to turn bga's statement around and say she was clear because of it, which makes absolutely no sense: 1. Guess who's the number!

Also, if you would refrain from ad hominems, that would facilitate your stance both in this discussion and in games. It is rather difficult to believe someone to be town when they go on the defensive and curse at people at the slightest provocation.

Again, cheers.

Course it does. Lesbian: I think elec is mafia
you: no i love you Lesbian: ok ok back to bga

Sweet.

As far as BGA's last comment, do you not realize that he said "my partner WONT CHANGE" which would have excluded me? My vote was on you. Which would have meant it was either you or instigator. And between someone who volunteered the first day and has been consistently protown the entire game versus someone who pushes hard and distorts bga's claims, the person who volunteers the first day will win 99% of the time in a lylo situation.

Maybe you should volunteer next time.

In addition, your lead on bga pressed harder than the cop's actual lead on bga, which was something to be questioned. Being the first to lead a lynch does not automatically make you the clear the next day. In fact, it can work against you, which is what happened here. Did instigator use the first day volunteer strategy to the utmost? Yes. Was it a gamble? Yes. But he won, and he played well. The fact of the matter is, he outplayed both of us, and it didn't help that you were so god damned scummy.

Cheers.