Newlywed’s is back, and it’s time to put your hearts on the line once again! How well do you know your partner? How well do they know you? Find out through signing up and playing!
Sign up with a partner and go head-to-head with 3 other pairings.
Each game will consist of 8 players in total which equals 4 Brides, 4 Grooms, and 4 couples. Specify which one of you wants to be the Bride and Groom; otherwise you’ll be randomly assigned a title.
HOW TO PLAY:
There are two groups: The Brides and the Grooms.
There will be two rounds in total.
One round will be for the Grooms to answer questions about the Brides, the other for the Brides to answer questions about the Grooms. Both groups will be sent 10 questions before their round begins, each group getting a different set of questions.
You and your partner will try to answer as many questions about each other correctly as you possibly can. Each question is worth 10 points; the pair with the highest score will be crowned the best couple!
DETAILS:
Discord is required. You will be using both discord and the EM browser to play.
You will be sent questions and asked to submit them through discord, while answering questions will be happening through the EM game.
The game will last around an hour or two.
Both players must post in the thread to confirm your spot. First come, first serve.
Nice to see someone else who was into the atheist stuff. People seem to hate them as a bloc now, even though the atheist stuff and the anti-sjw stuff are separate topics.
hide block J is a stone cold fox. "hot momma", "hunka-hunka burnin' love", a "fine piece of ", and "easy on the eyes". for being a total flirt notoriously scandalous Noted as looking damn good. EXTREMELY NSFW FILE PHOTO I know she wants me. She plays pretty hard to get, but she glistens a little differently for me, you know? [This is probably the worst one. No concept of consent or boundaries] I would the shit out of that doorknob. [unless this is]
None of these would be appropriate to say about a person without their express consent, and wouldn't be appropriate to say in public at the workplace pretty much ever. That's not even getting into some of the comments in this thread.
Anyway, that's why I downvoted. I understand that a large number of you don't agree with me. I don't think you are bad person for liking it, or that djkaktus is a bad person for writing it, but I don't personally find it funny, and it does make me a little bit angry (but I'm pretty much angry all the time anyway, so don't think that's all that special). Also do note that my sense of humor was shot off in the war.
I guess we are going to have this conversation. My apologies in advance.
The language used in the article treats the object as a sexual object (which I get, it's "objectifying" something that's already an object, ha ha) but I feel like it comes across in a very "nudge nudge wink wink/boys will be boys" kind of way that seems to imply that it is appropriate to treat actual people who you are attracted to in this fashion.
Yes, this is a joke about how people are attracted to people, which (If you're not aware) is still a thing that absolutely happens.
People can be attracted to other people and still treat them with respect. They can be attracted to other people in the workplace and still be professional. They can certainly be attracted to people and not assume that person is obligated to anything in return, or accuse them of being a "flirt" or "notoriously scandalous".
Did I laugh? A few times. The punchline at the end got me, and i do appreciate the idea of the Foundation wasting countless dollars and man-hours concocting and conducting doorknob-specific sexual harassment seminars.
Ultimately, though, it runs long; there's a whole lot of space in there with not a lot of joke to fill it.
So, not uproarious, which as a -J means -1.
Edit: On why this is icky. There are three possibilities for this anomaly: 1: The doorknob is unnaturally attractive and reams of Site-19 staff are already overt sexual harassers. Which, gross. 2: The doorknob compels people to sexually harass it. Which, super-gross. 3: The doorknob is SO attractive that it MAKES people harass it. Which, hi there victim-blaming.
And no, the facts that it's 1) an inanimate doorknob and 2) a joke SCP don't make that better. I might look past it if the joke were drop-dead funny, but it's not.
well no, this was mostly first come first serve with an exception of two couples who told me they were interested through discord and weren't able to post yet.
it was unfair to allow them to reserve without having to post outright and i understand how making room for another couple i personally like was also unfair. i won't be doing this again and will learn from it, sorry.
