It is true that white people tend to have smaller p*nises than black people. However, some white people have larger p*nises than some black people. Also, just because white people have, on average, smaller p*nises, that doesn't make them worth any less than black people. So, there is no need to point this sort of thing out.
ok so how are u gonna describe people "he was black and tall" or "his skin pigmentation showed the had a high level of melanin in his skin" or "he was tall". race is just a way of describing someone and its easier and more descriptive to say black. if it means something for u to say black then ur the problem
words and descriptions are supposed to have meanings. Of course when you don't know, you just assume to the closest thing you can think of, while using a general description.
But if you are giving a description of people of multiple various subsets as a whole, it would be quicker to say "people of color" rather than, "white, black, Chinese, Indian, Filipino, Mexican, Puerto Rican" and all that other stuff.
And of course there are mixed-racial and multi-racial in which referring to one in a particular fashion would be difficult. Thus the term, person of color.
Race is not important to the whole, it is only important to the person, as we both agree. Obviously since I have lighter skin and I am Caucasian, I am known as white. But me being white is insignificant except if I committed a crime and they are looking for a white person.
in fact, I am doing my own case studies about the amount of people of different races attend the 30 public high schools in Las Vegas, and comparing it to the general achievement of the schools currently.
What I find is that there is no correlation between race and overall academic achievement, thus indicating that it is not about unchanging factors such as race or descent, but rather on culture/media such as "in the west here, we care about our stuff", or other cliches like such.
Within these case studies, I also track other variables too. There is wealth distribution all around, and in fact one of the poorest schooling zones has one of the highest amount of success.
All of the schools have between 2000-3000 students and around 80-90 teachers making around a 1:25-33 T-S ratio
Magnet programs are generally found in schools with an average amount of achievement, but lower income/wealth communities, and these magnet programs consist of around 10% of the population of the school.
Religious communities of all types are around Las Vegas, and there is no isolation of religious community in any zoning area, despite popular cliche here.
It is really just about the staff and the general motivation of the students.
ok so how are u gonna describe people "he was black and tall" or "his skin pigmentation showed the had a high level of melanin in his skin" or "he was tall". race is just a way of describing someone and its easier and more descriptive to say black. if it means something for u to say black then ur the problem
in fact, I am doing my own case studies about the amount of people of different races attend the 30 public high schools in Las Vegas, and comparing it to the general achievement of the schools currently.
What I find is that there is no correlation between race and overall academic achievement, thus indicating that it is not about unchanging factors such as race or descent, but rather on culture/media such as "in the west here, we care about our stuff", or other cliches like such.
just call me black like i call u white ffs people scared of being politically incorrect when in reality i can see and notice my skin is black and no one really cares but u. you should have added a game mode for bsm cant talk in here hes gonna have a circus on this topic
my examples are only to explain that there is a wide variety of color, and how not everybody is white or black.
In all reality, race is virtually insignificant other than denoting your family history in which I said, there are a few outliers all around, so even that is proven non-indicative.
When I refer to someone or a peoples as "white, black, Asian, Hispanic, etc.," I am typically referring to a subset that consists mostly of that background.
I don't care if you are white, black, etc. Where I come from, we are all-inclusive, allow opportunities to everyone, and there is no particular aggression or hate being promoted or directed towards any particular peoples by the general public, only by a few biased extremist idiots. There is no general oppression to anybody, and the only separations are by qualification or achievement.
Of course, these people who are under the spectrum of, "people of color" know their descent and would know if they are "black", "Asian", "Mexican", or whatever else.
But in the contrary, you can look at most people of white pigmentations and you can most likely assume that they are of North/West European descent, with only a few minor outliers.
just call me black like i call u white ffs people scared of being politically incorrect when in reality i can see and notice my skin is black and no one really cares but u. you should have added a game mode for bsm cant talk in here hes gonna have a circus on this topic
People of color contains a wider spectrum than black. It could refer to any typical non-whites such as Asian, MesoAmerican, South American, Hispanic, Orient, Middle Eastern, Judaic, North/West/East/South/Central African, Islander, Native American, Aleut, Aborigine, Maori, and so on.
I don't want to label someone with dark skin and say, "Black or African descent" because there are people of Greek origin with dark pigmentations who would not necessarily refer to themselves as black, they would refer as whatever they feel like.
People of color is used in order to denote anybody whose skin tone is noticibly non-white.
whites are the real people of colour, you can commonly find whites with multiple colours of hair and eyes while blacks always have black hair and black hair