Mods abuse of power

DemiRoseover 8 years ago

My previous post was deleted, presumably by a mod. I'm reposting this because I'm not gonna be silenced.

A user was wrongfully banned because another user thought their name was that of a Na'zi. The mods, without doing research, banned the user. After being presented with detailed explanation of why the ban is unfair, the mods point blank refused to admit their mistake. Please see attached screenshots in chronological order. To Nathan, Dag, introverted, ErzaScarlet, JonSnow, Bebop and Liam: please witness how your peer ignored an epicmafia user who was wrongfully reported

https://imgur.com/a/27u58

YHWHover 8 years ago
Apropos used to be the chill mod. now he is a fascist who seeks to limit our speech. according to Apropos, all Germans are na'zis? There is a word for discriminating against people due to their ethnic identities Apropos, and that word is "racist".

Let's refer to the rules:

Harassment
Making repeated/severe personal attacks toward or slandering another Epicmafia user when the user has asked the harasser to stop. If filing on behalf of another user, one must show the consent of the harassed person.
Expires in 6 months

Trolling
Antagonizing other players, disrupting gameplay through actions or communications, or otherwise playing to get negative reactions from other players. Hipfiring can also fall under GT/Trolling depending on intent/scenario and is moderated on a case to case basis with discretion. Low contrast colours that are difficult to read also falls under trolling at the discretion of a moderator.
Expires in 3 months

Mod Abuse
Use of moderator or admin privileges for personal gain including but not limited to being selectively harsh on certain disliked players, or selectively lenient on favored players. Moderators being rude to the player base will not be tolerated either. This rule applies to lobby mods for Sandbox, Survivor, and Games. Report admin infractions by email to [email protected] with 'epicmafia' in the subject header.
Harkinianover 8 years ago
hahaha Christ are you lot for real?



Next time pay attention in History class - you lot probably banned him because you saw a German name and a black and white photo.

Unless you make the argument that every single German that lived between 1933 and 1945 was a Nаzi, then Franz von Papen categorically was not a Nаzi, just like Paul von Hindenburg similarly wasn't.
YHWHover 8 years ago
na'zi: censored

antifa: uncensored

can u tell which one is evil & which one is good
deleteddeletedover 8 years ago
The censoring reminds me of the na'vi from avatar
deleteddeletedover 8 years ago
he/you can't use that or any other username relating to na'zism
deleteddeletedover 8 years ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franz_von_Papen

ctrl + f "n/azi" ... 90 results ... hmmm...
DemiRoseover 8 years ago
he wasn't. he was never a na'zi.
deleteddeletedover 8 years ago
I thought the question was whether or not he was a n'azi
DemiRoseover 8 years ago
Recidivism
I'll bite.

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/nuremberg-trial-defendants-franz-von-papen
he was acquitted
deleteddeletedover 8 years ago
oh yeah, you're right - i was pretty spaced out when i was reading/replying to those PMs
deleteddeletedover 8 years ago
He thinks caricatures is singular
deleteddeletedover 8 years ago
you can make fun of Apropos for using isn't instead of aren't in that screenshot though, that's funny
deleteddeletedover 8 years ago
I'll bite.

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/nuremberg-trial-defendants-franz-von-papen