Back to Community

The Peaceful Revolution

almost 7 years

Today, many people wander why the people who rule our nations actually act against democracy more than ever before. People have been turned against each other via the ideas they disagree on, making it easier to pick them off one by one and the leaders to choose what side they want to win, as they themselves created all of the sides.

One of Hillary Clintons emails reads that Mexicans are loyal consumers, meaning that Mexicans are a desirable community to appease because of the ease of control by the people in charge. Nobody really understands how serious this is, as it's a form of what I call "democratic fascism" in which everybody believes their side of the argument matters when in reality, the hammer gets dropped slowly on the opposing points of views to the people who were never going to take the side of the common people to begin with.

Communication is used to commit genocide in ways people might not understand. By breaking people up into so many different groups instead of letting the groups mix and mash ideas homogeneously, you can turn every other group against another group if there are enough conflicting interest to do so.

Let me give you a hypothetical example. Say Hillary Clinton wanted to get rid of grape jelly because the Waltons who pay her money to lobby, believe it's too expensive to produce compared to strawberry jelly due to waste or some crap like that. Just make some excuse up. So Hillary Clinton being who she is, tries to say that grape jelly causes cancer and two groups form. One group likes grape jelly and one group is against it. Hillary Clinton begins dividing all of the groups of different types of jelly, up. Eventually you have pineapple jelly and all sorts of jelly groups. Hillary Clinton raises the price on jelly and makes everybody angry, blaming grape jelly eaters for the price raise through some excuse. Everybody starts to be made to hate grape jelly eaters until a political push is used to ban grape jelly. Credit for making everybody happy is given to strawberry jelly eaters. Kind of get what I'm getting at? The real democratic process is similar, except instead of jelly, we have the ability of an entire group to communicate. Take right wingers for example. By attacking their ability to communicate or even vote for their own stance on a matter, you take them out of the equation. Believe it or not, this does cause genocide for the people being excommunicated from social and democratic forum.

So what's going on today though? Is it really just fascism as always? No. Our leaders are trying to destroy and rebuild a whole new first world rather we like it or not. How are they doing it? By forcing a human version of the end to the mouse utopia. The reason the mice died out was because of a failure to communicate which forced the rejection overall of the colony the mice were in. To understand this more, you have to look at ants.

Ants pass by other ants emitting a pheromone which tells other ants what kind of ant they are, rather that be a mining ant or a food gathering ant. If there are too many of one type of ant, the ant becomes the type there are too little of, which is decided by a sample of ants that the ant passes by when travelling.

In the case of the mice and even different races of humans, it's very similar. If a mice passes by another mice from one colony and gets attacked, and keeps passing by mice that keep attacking it, then that mice will reject the colony and attack any mice from the colony. If a white guy sees a bunch of black people causing trouble, committing acts of hullaginism (which is a crime by the way), or committing crime in general, then the white guy will reject black people, as there simple ways we communicate, believe it or not, has lead us up to this moment through our attempt to survive. It's a mammal thing to do and even apparently an insect thing. In fact, so many animals do this, that I would even say it's natural and that what somebody is exposed to, ultimately dictates. We say that the victim, which is the person who was exposed to too much that gave them ideas we dislike, is at fault. Through our leaders attempt to "ban grape jelly" if you will, we hurt other humans that aren't just psychopaths like our leaders and so our leaders can't empathize for them.

So the mice sometimes have disagreements. Sometimes one mice will be unable to mate with another mice because a rapist mice keeps attacking that mice or that mice gets attacked by the mice they wanted to mate with. Because of this, eventually the mice passes a point where that mice rejects the colony, but, the colony itself, when the mice are in a large enough number, has enough mice that reject each other so much, that it creates a thresh hold. Once the thresh hold is reached, the number of mice that reject each other, runs away exponentially and the entire colony collapses.

By making individual groups of people, one at a time, unable to communicate between each other instead of just purely keeping them out of the democratic and social forum, you collapse that group into a state of genocide in which they reject themselves. This is further helped when parents tell their kids that everybody else is trash except them, which I know my parents did when I was growing up and all the other kids had a lot nicer things than I had. The culture is rigged to implode and not just for one race, but, for all races and groups across the board. Through this process, democracy slowly becomes invalidated as the majority of people attack each other one at a time and "real fascism" takes over. This is some modern day big brother style crap.

This means that one of two things will inevitably happen across all first world countries that share the whole international banking system. Either one, we will all have a civil war which will lead to mass imprisonment and a new fascist system will take over from what was here before or we will have an invasion by a foreign country that is trying to coup us, namely China.

almost 7 years

AnonymousMafia says

In solution 2, you are very confused how the world works. A country doesn't just come and take over another country anymore, this isn't f***ing 19th Century, this is 21st Century.

Please stop writing what you don't know.


Soooooo why the are they still occupying Tibet and Napal?
almost 7 years
tl;dr also The Peaceful Revolution (German: Friedliche Revolution) was the process of sociopolitical change that led to the end of the Socialist Unity Party of Germany dominance of the German Democratic Republic (GDR or East Germany) and the transition to a parliamentary democracy which enabled the reunification of Germany. This turning point was wholly created through the violence-free initiatives, protests, and successful demonstrations, which decisively occurred between the local elections held in May 1989 and the GDR's first free parliamentary election in March 1990.
almost 7 years
In any civil war, the losing side is always the terrorist side by the end (and if the losing side is the couping side they were terrorists throughout)

So in solution one, there won't actually be mass imprisonment as such there will be mass slaughter on both sides and don't pretend it won't.


In solution 2, you are very confused how the world works. A country doesn't just come and take over another country anymore, this isn't f***ing 19th Century, this is 21st Century.

Please stop writing what you don't know.
almost 7 years
tl;dr