since there's some discussion about matt's player rankings, I will do my own player rankings. I don't have a max limit for how many players I'll do, so sign up whenever, I'll close signups in a week and i'll release my rankings afterward.
I'm not the absolute trashiest I'm so proud. I'd like to think that I have a better strategic game than to earn 44th, but since we haven't really played together you don't have much to go off of but my less than stellar reputation here. That, and, of course, my social game is trash enough that I can't effectively play anything strategically...
and the overall rankings was a more holistic view of people's games. sometimes i felt like the whole is worth more than the sum of its parts, but i admit i messed up sometimes.
What exactly decided overall rankings. I can tell it wasn't necessarily our individual stats since there are certain people ranked lower than people despite being higher in every category (physical, social, and strategy.)
So I guess I was just curious about that, as well as where the percentile came from, etc.
Just trying to understand the list better, that's all. I'm perfectly fine with my placement and agree with a lot of points.
deletedabout 7 years
It’s the little things ya know
deletedabout 7 years
AND I’M IN ROW 27 ON THE SPREADSHEET!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
