Back to Discussion

Never Nominated

over 7 years

I have a question to the survivor lobby, and I want people to discuss their opinions on this.

Let say you were Never Nominated in the entire Big Brother game, and you still manage to lose in the final 2, is it justified?

I remember a game I was never nominated, but I still manage to lose against cjn104.

Just a few minutes ago, Evolpz was never nominated, but I still managed to beat him in the jury 6-1

I know this probably happened to many others.

If you are not a fan of Big Brother, just survivor, what about never once receiving a vote against you entire game?

If you achieve the feat, but still lose in f2, is it justified?

over 7 years
It would be a guaranteed vote from me 95% of the time. Regardless of what people may think, it's pretty much impossible to go unnominated unless you have a fierce grip on the game. Even if you float the entire time, there's going to be times where you're nominated for a variety of reasons. Think of all the times where the crap player is nominated for being a pawn.
over 7 years

HardCarry says

Depends why the person was never voted/nommed. Is it because they did nothing in the game and was just a sheep so nobody felt the need to vote them or is it because they were playing really well?

Generally, a rule of thumb is the person who had 0 votes PROBABLY played better but there are some cases where it may not be the case.

The person who received votes may have received votes because he/she was playing the better game.


defending your win against miguel? ;P
over 7 years
Never nominated doesn't mean a good game.. You could be never nominated simply because you aren't a thread, and had no control. If you were never nominated because you had control over the game, and you were able to avoid being nominated due to impeccable control then sure. If you were never nominated simply because you were overlooked in favour of bigger threats then yeah you probably don't deserve to win.

Also whether or not someone is nominated says nothing about the person standing beside them in the f2. If you were never nominated yet you are standing in f2 with someone who was nominated yet managed to survive due to great social skill, or challenge skill. Or someone who was strategically able to arrange the votes in their favour, they may deserve to win over you.

I guess ultimately the amount you were nominated/voted does not speak towards your game play. It's how you got there :-)
over 7 years
Depends why the person was never voted/nommed. Is it because they did nothing in the game and was just a sheep so nobody felt the need to vote them or is it because they were playing really well?

Generally, a rule of thumb is the person who had 0 votes PROBABLY played better but there are some cases where it may not be the case.

The person who received votes may have received votes because he/she was playing the better game.
over 7 years
i lost to dean 3-3 then 4-2 and i wasnt nomminated once in the entire game while he was pawned multiple times
over 7 years
losing to cjn in f2 is an everyday occurrence, even if you were never nominated.

also just checked that game doc. you were never a final nominee either so that shouldn't have been a big factor.
over 7 years
bump