Back to Personal

Document Fixed

LastProphet
almost 8 years

Social Technician: Solutions for a New World

Ever notice how everything is becoming better at being worse? Ever notice how every attempt to keep society from reaching the point of no return, has been met by irrational amounts of resistence and funded more money than the obvious correct answer to the presented questions and statements in our political forums? This is no magical event of extreme global bad luck, but, the result of an autocrat in collectivist. If you want to know the approach to the solutions of problems in the United States when dealing with autocrats, than hear me out.

Index-

  • Introduction

Introduction

I don't like giving away the content in the introduction to my documents, but, I will warn people reading this that in order to understand the context of my documents, you'll have to read the introduction. To begin with, the context in which I'v learned everything that I'm going to be telling others so that they can get a better grasp of exactly what it is that it going on in the world today without going off topic, is so abstract that there previously haven't been any literature available on the subject, forcing me to have to write it all myself. The second issue is that to explain everything, words people are use to using in a particular manner have to be used in another way to explain an idea that isn't popular enough for everyone to be able to come across the right way the first time they hear it. The third and greatest issue with everything in this documentation is that nobody before me in any philosophy book I'v come across, has written anything even close to what I'v written except that of a popular novelist from the far right, whom which I greatly dislike because of the political disposition, therefore making both the left and right very incompatable with my ideas. My ideas aren't about market either. This entire idea is somewhat abstract, but, very simple. Since I said I won't discuss anything in the context of what it is that I'll be writing, in the introduction, I'll instead explain the purpose for the document. To begin with, social technician wasn't the word I was going to use to discribe the kind of ideas this document is about. I was going to use the word social narrative, but, too many people online have heard me use the word, thus, everyone there has not only adopted the word social narrative for their own use, but, has destroyed it's context because they didn't understand how I was using it to begin with. A social narrative is suppose to be someone who understands the mechanisms hidden behind the collective that cause history to repeat itself, thus, allowing them to artificially create any social anomaly they desire. If you find the word social narrative, I'm almost certain this isn't what you will find. This makes social technician more fitting, but, doesn't sound as desirable as the word social narrative from my own point of view. I'v written this document primarily in the hopes that someone with an open mind that has a good filter, would dissiminate all the information properly without have to hear any rants I have to say and taking them too personal. Although I don't rant very much in anything I write, sometimes I can't help myself. This subject should be completely practical and understandable to someone with an open mind that understands the rules I'v layed out about the context of the words I'm using. Though some of these sentences may be seen as a run on, the punctuation and context of each sentence is important to properly giving the full message. I would like to make this similar to that of a text book you would get from a university, merely because the ideas in this book are very practical in real world applications and it would appeal also to the people who are normally closed minded and pretentious. Many people might think they have no use for this document. Homeless people might not seem to have a lot of power in their lives because they don't have a source of income and are at the whim of society, but, homeless people have the potential to change the cycles of history themselves without realizing it. The issue is that most homeless people have some kind of deficiency in chemicals in the brain or in knowledge being handed to them about how easy it is to do things in life, never having anyone push them just a little bit to get them going. This isn't a bad thing for this documents point of view, but, is in fact a good thing because homeless people are more likely to understand what I'm saying than someone who hasn't ever had problems in their entire life. The thing that is the most valuable relative to this subject, isn't money, which means that this isn't something that can be really purchased except through this document by someone who didn't already understand this, but, when everyone understands it, the entire playing field changes. What has value ends up being people who are individuals more so than collectives of people who have lots of money. What drove me to write this documentation is a very complex set of environmental changes in my life in a very specific patter which led me in the end to come up with all of this on my own for the most part, but, others believe they understand the same thing while they don't. Understanding what this document is about is like being the biggest and brightest sun flower in a field of sun flowers that have all failed to blossom. This is because people don't realize that suffering and doing things you didn't want to do, is a very important part to the growth of human understanding. Over doing it can lead some people to hurt themselves or others, but, there is a balance here. My entire life, I'v stood up for myself and was always the one who got in trouble in the end, even more so than my attackers, merely because everyone was against me. The reason they were against me, I didn't really understand. It hurt me to think that I was punished many times in my life for doing the right thing. What made something right wasn't that the action taken was right, but, that everyone believed so. Because of this, if I was undesirable or just so happen to be at the wrong place and wrong time, what would of been right such as defending yourself against an attack, suddenly becomes wrong. This forces you into a prisoner state of mind where you are forced to be punished for something you didn't do. This alone is merely the soil which the seed of wisdom is planted. When I was growing up, I was deprived of many things merely because my parents had beliefs that certain things are right and wrong. Take sex as an example. I wasn't sexual active as a teenager because I was too busy focusing on things that were more entertaining than temperary gratification. I was busy caring about accomplishing goals that actually had a long term effect, such as reading books about agriculture. My father, merely because it wasn't his culture to do this, believed I was a homosexual, which till this day, I'm not and most likely will never be. I don't really care for homosexuals much and I don't mean that in a negative sense, because the idea behind homosexuality being bad is fundamentally the same as homelessness being bad. Merely because it looks ugly and the community as a whole doesn't like it and acts entitled while holding double standards against individuals that are entitled, suddenly something you can't help such as truly being unfortunant and homeless due to a chemical imbalance, is illegal. That is the same as making it illegal to be a minority because there isn't enough people who care about something that doesn't concern them, even though the people attacking the minority in democracy doesn't need to be concerned, yet, choose to be for their own social aesthetics. Growing up, I always knew how to invest my money into what made me happy more so than what made my society accept me. My family, I can't say the same. Because of this, I have a family that looks down on me, even when I have more than they have in every possible way. They think they are deprived instead, merely because society wouldn't accept them as much because they don't have their own house or have never been in the military. This deprivation state of mind for me, merely ask me what I need to change about myself to make myself a better person. In the case of my family, it's always been that others should change instead of themselves, causing them to instead, resort to desperate measures to keep their pride. These deperate measures include stealing the work other people have done and taking credit for the actions of others, parasiting off someone while financially abusing that person and attacking that person when they choose not to work anymore because there isn't anything they would gain from it, lying in front of legal consultants and federal authority, and belittling their victims and those who try to support the victim. You might think that my family is just bad because of these things, but, the reality of the matter is that they aren't different than most people who have much more than they do in society. People just don't realize this because it isn't them who is having their pride hurt because what they believe is wrong. It's merely pride being hurt or having pride at all, that seems to be the greatest damage in our society and furthers the growth of those who would like a ticket out of hell. When I look at the political forum today, left and right, I see two different people that have pride for what they believe in. Both sides think the other side is primative; In reality, both sides are correct about the part where the the counter argument is primative and can't accept that they themselves are any different. Both points of view are two sides of the same point of view, collectivism, which has been tried for all of the written history of human kind, yet, despite the collective believing that it's wrong for someone to force their will over another person, both would like to enforce their will because the collective has fed the pride of what they believe, while the only reason most believe what they do is because how they were raised as a child and what they were told was right and wrong throughout being a child. Many people say children shouldn't be indoctrinated with the ideas of the left or right, but, will still end up taking a side of left or right and indoctrinating the children in their favor, meaning the side that doesn't indoctrinate as much would merely be taken for in the end, forcing both sides to indoctrinate. When either side fails to indoctrinate the young, the distinct property of their children that they disagree with suddenly becomes a crime from their point of view, and instead of just accepting that somebody has a different opinion, the attack the opinion instead. The collective is so powerful in the numbers they have that they believe they could do whatever they want, and could if they wanted, but, when they think the government is against them because a law didn't get passed, they fail to realize that this wasn't because the government is corrupt, but, because there was another side of the argument that they ignored for their own pride in what their core belief was. The collective causes a great many number of people to be under represented. Children, homeless, homosexuals, and many more people are all under represented and probably more politically involved except the children because they have no legal authority due to age, merely because these people are under represented legally. Homeless people have to go somewhere and when people think they look ugly on the streets and make it illegal for homeless to be on the streets, society as a whole ends up paying for a place for homeless to stay. We turn against the homeless because of our pride, yet many people don't realize there is a thin line between them and the homeless, until it's too late. As for children having the ability to take part in the political process, there isn't really any effect it would have seeing that children are a minority these days, anyway. Children might not be able to legally defend themselves, but, it doesn't mean they shouldn't be able to make getting a spanking, illegal. It sounds irrational that a child should have any say in a system they don't understand, but, the funny thing is that most people don't understand the system themselves and so in the end, getting what they want is no different than a child. People want control over others in this system that it's very easy for the minority to be ignored, however, children have to get older some time and the people who had power before have to get rid of that power, even in death. Examples like this, such as homelessness needing a place to go, children having to grow up some time, and woman being able to raise the child as they wish and show a child how terrible their father is, all comes together to destroy the past and create the future. Each and everyone one of you people reading this might not like that you don't have complete control over society, nor admit that you ever wanted it, but, when I attack your pride, are you going to bend a knee to the truth. Not with pride you aren't. The truth is, some people will never change, even if society forces them to. It's not really a change, as when they are left alone long enough, they will just change back. In the end, if people wanted to change anything, they would have to be murderers and resort to ancient ignorant ideas that shouldn't exist anymore, but, do because people forgot how that ended. The biggest reason this argument needs to be solved is because instead of resorting to something that doesn't work in commiting genocide against an idea, people may resort to technology to enforce their belief. What will happen in that situation? The simple answer is as history repeats itself, people will probably get a frontal lobatomy just as the egyptians use to get so that they would be docile. The greatest difference between them and us is that we have technology that will be able to control the mind more. The greatest target here is the pride of the collective. To further my growth, I had to not only have a problem, but, a problem I couldn't possibly solve because it was made impossible by society to solve, such as being financially abused. When I grew up in a financially abusive situation, I realized how hard it was to not be homeless, being that I had to choose between tyranny at home or be free on the streets. I didn't know how to do basic things homeless people could do, thus, holding me back. I didn't have a mental disorder either other than extreme stress and depression, but, I was never legally diagnosed with depression. Instead the doctor thought there was nothing wrong with me because I seemed to be in a decent mood at the moment. This was a shame. The hardest part wasn't being free, but, understanding the prison I was in to begin with. This prison had no walls, I wasn't on chains, and if I was, I wouldn't feel any different than I do now. When someone wanted something from me productive, all the had to do was stop me from doing it long enough for me to have the need to do it strongly, then finally letting me do what I needed to do long ago, only when it helped them. This is how I get farmed without having anything to begin with. I'm a bee with no honey and the only way to get honey is to do someone elses work first, then when I have honey, that gets taken from me as well. If you were to keep someone from drinking beer at a young age, but, they've never done it their entire life and finally they have a chance to try it while everyone goes around pretending it's the greatest thing in the world, first chance they get, they will likely give it a try if it's promoted in such a manner. This is the case also with having a sex partner, smoking hemp, and much more. In my life, my family always showed me how great everything was while telling me it wasn't great, thus, first chance I would get, I would obviously try it. Truth be told, the fact they said something was or wasn't great really didn't matter to me. It was when I saw that it was great that really did. This is because my family members are horrible actors. I'v noticed when it comes to teaching someone how to make their own choices or how to find safe havens from their own family members, the family of that person around where I'm from, gets very upset with whoever told them the truth that set them free. These same people will go to political movements and try to pretend we need to work together to make the world a better place. Take a look at religion in general. This is a huge tool for control, as it mostly abuses many of the things that make us human by telling us that it's wrong to do, while at the same time, telling us in the end that it's okay because everyone makes mistakes and there isn't anything you can do about it. This is so bad, people actually believe it's impossible for someone to go through life without making mistakes, and people even use the term that nobody is perfect to justify their mistakes when they have no other excuse. I have nothing against the actual moral of many religions, but, when it comes to a religion such as catholicism, it's in your face that it is used for control. The catholic church never even publishes the entirety of everything that should be in the bible and when they do, it immediately gets attacked and changed by the religions that came before the catholic church.

Bonus for EpicMafia Users

Essentially the greater counter collective tool I'v ever seen is being anonymous. When you put this together with something like dress code for a homeless shelter, and pair it with something such as self generating neural networks connect to video games which are a free service of entertainment for the homeless while upgrading security, you have a whole new system for society that forces a restructure of who is in charge based on logistic skills and community skills. Thank you for reading. for reading.

sl0nderman
almost 8 years
I can think of a few other reasons why you're all alone.
LastProphet
almost 8 years
Psh. I don't think you grasped what I said completely. The issue with even explaining it is a lack of logistics from the view points of others, as well as a lack of the ability to use the process of elimination. Oh well. Maybe this is why I'm almost all alone.
byeshire
almost 8 years

LastProphet says

(1/2)


I got your point there fam.

There's a 50% side of us that works on it's own.
The other 50% is a team player.
Anti-collectivism is making a collective, individualist, that's how I understood it. Am I right?

The part that I didn't understand in this is,
If all people has their own beliefs, wouldn't there be too much conflict? Too much to consider and too much to think of?

Won't other people think that they're selfish for having their own opinions and thus pushing them to create another collective. Like an endless cycle. (It's hard to explain)


LastProphet says

(2/2)


I'm having troubles with the anonymous things.
Are you saying that you would want to "tell" collectives of these ideas by pretending to be a "collective"?

There will always be people who would prefer to think of "the greater good" rather than to have their own ideas, not because they want to be, because that's how they were raised and that's how society worked for all these years. In short, there's something that can't be washed out. See the last paragraph on my first quote—influence, let's say that an individualist influenced others to be an have their own beliefs, and another individualist thought that that the other ideas are gibberish then he shared his ideas to other individualists and they both agreed to it, making them a collective. Like an endless cycle.

Don't misunderstand. I agree with this, but I'm trying to be as realistic. I'm not saying it's impossible but merely unpossible.

:)
LastProphet
almost 8 years

Chaika says

Usually your threads are long, but in a way that someone could actually read it.

In this case, it's just a giant wall of text. I would highly recommend using proper paragraphs if you wish for people to read what you typed.


The problem with paragraphs is that lucid made some kind of system that turns paragraphs into thin single lined sentences that go on forever without going to the next line, which forced me to use one massive paragraph instead to get past the glitch.
deletedalmost 8 years
is this what drugs do?
LastProphet
almost 8 years
it won't let me say rrraaapppeee because it's already illegal here :(
LastProphet
almost 8 years
When you have something like anonymous, it seems like a collective, correct? When you have a nation, it seems like a collective, but, in reality, it's so vast that the collective no longer plays a huge factor in how people who associate themselves with nationality or being anonymous, no longer snowball into making things irrational, illegal, except at first and it isn't something that isn't reversible, but instead, something more of a meme to this collective. I'v noticed that since anonymous isn't a race or gender, although it destroys how the collective identifies an individual, it actually makes someone more individual in the fact that they can't associate themselves with anyone else other than everyone else. Nobody is discriminated against and nobody tried to make saying the word , illegal, without being met with a massive amount of resistance.

When people make laws, they should be able to attach how much resistance the law should have to have in order to change, based directly on how many people at the time supported the law, with a default minus of ten percent so that a law doesn't somehow get stuck at a need for 99 percent of people to be against it. This proportion is essential in balancing the snowball effects of collectivism. Also, chiefs of a department shouldn't be the dictating factor in how the department operates. Society needs new hierarchies for people that are professionals in logistics, collective manipulation, people who do repetitive task need special privileges, and a few others should be added to the round table of every city, state, and national democracy to properly function the ideas of a real democracy. Thank you for listening.(2/2)
LastProphet
almost 8 years

byeshire says

(insert message here)


No it's not my homework. It's something more personal to me. People are okay to believe what they want. I'm not saying this is a problem. What the problem is, is when the majority finds out how powerful they are in number. One day, rrraaapppeee becomes illegal because men have wives and believe their sensative places are sacred burial grounds, while the next day, because of the strength in numbers, it gets pushed too far by subversive people and merely saying rrraaapppeee or accusing someone of rrraaapppeee, can become just as illegal in some civilizations because of the collective.

I have a solution for this which I call anti collectivism. It's like a break point for civilization in order to keep them from going to far. Before I go over that though, I would like to say a few more things.

The more people communicate with each other, the more they get use to not thinking for themselves. When this happens, people will no longer be able to understand being able to communicate with an individual thinker. The purpose of saying that we need to better define individual is because what I really mean is that we need to understand the contrast better in order to even head toward the state of individualism. An individual is someone who can make their own choices without someone else telling them something and believes their own beliefs without someone telling them something that changes their belief. Someone who isn't "refined". We are born individuals.(1/2)
cub
almost 8 years
didn't read please go on
sl0nderman
almost 8 years
didn't read but shut up
Intrat
almost 8 years
Did not read the text but already now that his solution is a spook.
deletedalmost 8 years
phewwwww
byeshire
almost 8 years
We must accept the fact that an individual isn't a part of the majority.
There's a fact that can't be changed, people will always take on different sides.
You can't judge their choices because you haven't seen life from their point of view just like how people see the number 6 and 9.
Right and wrong is an illusion. Good and bad differs from person to person. Just like how a collective point at someone who started a fight to be at fault
whilst in the other hand, another collective points fingers at someone for fighting back. It differs. Understanding is the real deal.
But you can't force someone to understand something he can't. Even if he says he understands maybe he doesn't. "I must understand because it's the 'right' thing to do"
"It's for the sake of common good" etc etc. One does not simply. force ideals into a thinking brain. He's a person and he has opinions.
I myself have been in several arguments where I tried to correct people but there's people who just doesn't liste. Why? Because they're true to what they believe in.
One person does not simply vhange a person's belief. You can understand people while still fighting for whatever it is that you wanted.
One does not simply manipulate a person with a brain and a heart. This itself is an opinion. I apologize if I misunderstood this or if my answer was fasr from what you were looking for but
oh well, that's how I do it. :)

I saw a few of this in the internet tho LOL Is this really for a homework? LMAO.
I have a few grammar mistakes >///<
Chaika
almost 8 years
I'm sure maybe 1 or 2 people do. For all I know, it's just some copy pasta or just work for his assignment in class that he secretly wants us to help him on.

All I know is that this topic has a gigantic wall of text with no paragraphs separating his points in a way that'd be easy to read.
cub
almost 8 years
idk if i ever read a lastprophet thread even the ones i replied to i didnt read
Chaika
almost 8 years
Usually your threads are long, but in a way that someone could actually read it.

In this case, it's just a giant wall of text. I would highly recommend using proper paragraphs if you wish for people to read what you typed.
cub
almost 8 years
does bonus for epicmafia users mean you paste this everywhere
Heck
almost 8 years
same