Glow doesn't know what cheating for gain is so she thinks I twisted her words. So here's what she said so she can't use lack of English knowledge as a platform to say I'm lying. "SINEAD runs all the time and cheats and it ruins comp. how can I ruin comp when I only play like 5 games a round."
When asked why Glow won't admit to cheating and take her rightful ban she says it's because she doesn't run so her cheating isn't for gain essentially lmfao
Glow says she was told by Edark that Dag rejected immunity. Aka Glow says that the admin said he was banning her friend she thought she was protecting and she says "oh well lmao" and proceeds to not discuss it with Dag or defend him until /I/ bring it up to her. Good friend?!?!?!
>Body >aka me >told one friend about Dag cheating, who eventually told a mod >Dag gets 1 day ban >Dag calls Body "low being" for "purposely ratting on him" >false >if that was my intention, I could've directly talked to edark
>Glow >aka not me >posts on a freaking thread about Dag cheating >publicly rats him out and purposely tells the admins about the log >gets his friend, Sinead, banned >and himself too >she lies that he refused immunity >Dag still defends Glow
?????????????????????? ??????????????????????? ??????????????????????????????? ??????????????? ????????????????????????? Dag bro?
Thecolonel. SINEAD should be banned, my issue is that Glow blurred out in the logs the evidence of her cheating and her other friends cheating. I think they should all be banned lmao
[1/25/17, 2:27:06 PM] Jeff: i like how she puts [1/25/17, 2:27:07 PM] Jeff: on the thread [1/25/17, 2:27:12 PM] Jeff: that u openly rejected immunity [1/25/17, 2:27:16 PM] Jeff: in order to cover her own as.s [1/25/17, 2:27:44 PM] dag: I didn't, to be fair I didn't except to get banned at all
