1- brown wasnt allowed to trophy coz of the rule. They said to enforce it from next round. Do you agree that brown deserved to trophy?
2- if brown wasnt allowed then why should yachi be allowed? If you change the rule then enforce it from next round
3- I served 12 months of trophy ban and could have won 8 trophies. Deserved each one of them. Rule wasnt changed then. Last trophy was disallowed when only 3 days were left for 12 months to be over.
4- why shouldn't we punish yachi for cheating? Every cheater should be just set free coz they don't cheat always.
5- if you believe 4 months is enough then fuking go back in time and argue when the rule was set. I served 12 months for 24 hour ban and I didn't even cheat. Yachi actually did and she also got a note for cheating 2 months ago with same group.
6- the note she got was originally a cheating vio which was otd to be linient. Now you wanna be more linient?
i'm arguing for a rule change with yachi being the first.
8 month trophy ban for a cheating first is far too strict. if somebody wants a trophy, they're going to bypass on a new account and try to win on that.
we shouldn't punish her for winning a trophy legitimately, that has the adverse effect. yes, maybe she "shouldn't have cheated" in the first place, but i believe 4 months is enough for a 24 hour lobby ban.
I want a mod to confirm here why there is even a discussion regarding this. Are they actually considering bypassing the rule just to let their friend trophy because they "didn't cheat this time" . So people will cheat every round. One round they don't have evidence and win trophy. Get 24 hours one round. Fuking joke of a rule
It doesnt matter what it shouldn't have been. There is a fuking rule. Don't make rules if it's not followed for all.
deletedalmost 8 years
the team will probably rule against me. that's just my opinion. times have changed. the rule should never have been a 12 month trophy ban in the first place