The em debating going on is very unprofessional.

Here is an example of one of the teams argument: (Pamda and Xero)

VILDEN SHOULD BE UNBANNED 1)Vilden can change: :Vilden may have been treated poorly from others , and this is why he is so negative and mean towards people. They should be given a chance to repent and think about their mistakes, instead of being thrown out for their fowl language. Surely Vilden has done lot of mistakes but people who he raged against aint saints either. We believe VILDEN CAN CHANGE!!!!!!

2) He doesn't have many game related vios, they're mostly community Violations.

3) Lately the average level of comp players has been bad. A lot of players have no clue what they're doing and a lot of them are gt alts, trolls, etc. We need more good players like Vilden in order to get a good comp atmosphere.

Rebuttal: Our opponents may say that unbanning Vilden is a bad idea because he will keep on attacking other players if he is unbanned. But banning him won't change anything. He will bypass and make threads about the same people.

In closing, we think that the best thing to do in this situation is to let Vilden play games but forum ban him for some time. In fact, most of his HC/harassment vios come from the forums and not from games. UNBAN VILDEN!!

I have highlighted a few comical spelling and grammatical mistakes. (Unnecessary capitalisation of letters, misspelling of foul, treated poorly BY others* etc.)

Not to mention a lot of the logic behind this team's arguments is completely flawed. Suggesting that due to the level of comp being poor we should unban rule breakers is a laughable statement. Trying to say that since Vilden will bypass we should choose to not punish him is blatantly opposite reasoning to the key purpose of punishment. Bypassing should in fact reduce Vilden's likelihood to be unbanned. The statement saying that the people Vilden harassed "aint saints" is a fallacy of an argument (the basic principle of two wrongs don't make a right). This team suggests that Vilden "can change" when he was warned several times regarding harassment/hc and continued to do so willingly.

I think this teams only valid and logical argument is their suggestion for a forum ban, based on Vilden's discrepancies being predominantly linked to his forum activity. However considering Vilden's blatant ignorance for the rules and warnings of moderators and his tendency to bypass his suspension, I can't see any strong argument for leniency.