come talk to me once u get on my lvl
Big Brother's Spencer Clawson
Name 1 inconsistency in the world.
I don't know if you're aware of what you are. If you aren't then what differentiates us is that I'm able to see those inconsistencies.
You're dodging the question though
I don't think you're able to see inconsistencies in the world
do you think that im aware of what I am?
And even if I am my views on what you are still stand
Becomeclear says thecolonel says I don't but I'm going to believe it because anything else isn't worth believing in
thecolonel says and how do you know that
deleted over 8 years
Sorry about that veg. My programmer took me offline for a quick update and forgot that I was in a game.
Rather than what? I am not data compiled to resemble a person.
You think that physical people are plugged into a simulator like in The Matrix.
Arcbell says What's silly about it?
thecolonel says http://multivax.com/last_question.html for you my dear
edit:
actually after reading this a bit more carefully my link is not so relevant :<
Nevermind we're talking about different types of simulation. Yours is just silly.
Do you think it would be realistic for 7.4 billion people to be connected to the same device?
I'm not saying there's any reason to believe that I'm the only one stuck in this
Arcbell says thecolonel says Imagine the technology that would exist. I might have personal interactions with 10,000 people in my life. Wouldn't it be simpler to generate those personalities than rely on interconnection in the exponentially greater amount of simulations that would be running?
deleted over 8 years
Arcbell says thecolonel says The same reason there's onaholes in 3D virtual reality
Edark says thecolonel says https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sNhhvQGsMEc There are a lot of excuses that could be made but the simplest is that it isn't set into the controls
fair says Except one lies outside of the expectations of the status quo and one does not. This is near enough impossible to shake off.
