We are still discussing it, all overturns are final though because I don't want someone making a alignment complaint thread and for lucid to see it and take away my alignment asigner position. I am going to stay a fair and just alignment asigner.
I don't know, i think arc's probably more chaotic regardless of whether he's evil/neutral/etc. when it comes to the site. Buuuut I only know arc a lil bit and then mostly not when it comes to (lol) EM politics
Typical that while I'm drunk not a single person posts then the second I wake up with a massive hangover I have to deal with it reading my drunk posts and trying to work out my reasoning. lol
Okay after further deliberation I have decided to ammend Connor to Lawful Neutral.
[02/06/2016 11:50:42] Daze: his idea of good and right doesnt relate to the site imo, it relates to his own personal beliefs [02/06/2016 11:50:48] Daze: he wont budge or compromise on something [02/06/2016 11:50:55] Daze: even if it is shown to improve the site [02/06/2016 11:50:59] Daze: his way is the only way
I think Connor would be Lawful Good easily. The only differnce is its from his own morality and views rather than what's best for the site.
Isn't that the definition of Lawful Neutral
Is it if he thinks it's Good? I think he does what he thinks is best and what is good for the site, he's just disagreed with a lot. I don't really see him deviating enough from it to be Neutral.
Bronto was the only person I could think of on the top of my head that classed as Lawful Good which implies all actions he made were community and site minded and he tried hard to please and keep a nice environment. I could also see connor as Lawful Neutral.
Ok, agreed
i'd ask for one but I don't think you'd be able to give me an interesting 1 bc afaik we don't know each other (unless you're bumpers or something) and i don't think i've really expressed views towards the site all that much anyhow so i'd probably be given zhuorb and we can't have that!!!!
I think Connor would be Lawful Good easily. The only differnce is its from his own morality and views rather than what's best for the site.
Isn't that the definition of Lawful Neutral
Is it if he thinks it's Good? I think he does what he thinks is best and what is good for the site, he's just disagreed with a lot. I don't really see him deviating enough from it to be Neutral.
I think Connor would be Lawful Good easily. The only differnce is its from his own morality and views rather than what's best for the site.
Isn't that the definition of Lawful Neutral
I never said his actual views or morality was inherntly bad if we were to go by that he would be akin to an imperial guard from oblivion, but this is in regards to the site.
idk how u can construe anything i do as ill-intended but oh well
I explained this to Sachy, the scale is based on attitude towards site, players and the persons beliefs/leanings.
Not whether someone is inherently evil.
You stick to your mindset and beliefs no matter the current climate of the site and will get into heated arguments over them meaning that you are working towards your own goal rather than the goal that everyone else might be.
couldn't that be seen as lawful neutral or even lawful good since hibiki's beliefs and attitude towards the site are both well-intentioned? idk. not that the DnD system is supposed to really work or anything
Bronto was the only person I could think of on the top of my head that classed as Lawful Good which implies all actions he made were community and site minded and he tried hard to please and keep a nice environment. I could also see connor as Lawful Neutral.
I agree on arcbell being chaotic neutral though, not evil
same w hibiki. Evil seems like a stretch made by a drunken zelda freak or something
Regarding arcbell, to class him with the rest of the players who I have classed as chaotic evil, he would be such a heavy outlier as his alignment swings have been a lot heavier and impactful than the rest of them, I put him as chaotic to compensate for his alignment swings.