I think you would have stuck up for competitive mafia, but you can't, because you said:
[17/04/2016 09:05:27 PM] Connor: anyway i quit lol [17/04/2016 09:05:30 PM] [roadman]: i see [17/04/2016 09:09:23 PM] Connor: tl;dr every admin decision youve made since u started sucks, u dont deserve my respect imo and you ruined all the fun in modding so cya
why should i stick around to do something i don't enjoy with someone who refuses to do anything that doesn't fit his agenda
deletedover 8 years
I think you acted like a baby. You were a great mod and could have been a positive influence on a new admin, and worked to help shape things the right way, and instead you threw a fit.
[17/04/2016 09:05:27 PM] Connor: anyway i quit lol [17/04/2016 09:05:30 PM] [roadman]: i see [17/04/2016 09:09:23 PM] Connor: tl;dr every admin decision youve made since u started sucks, u dont deserve my respect imo and you ruined all the fun in modding so cya
i can't comment on 1, but i can admit fault in 2 because i also didnt bother to have a look. as for 3, i was never a fan of slowbro's forum posting, but i rationalised it internally by figuring it was the admin's problem and not mine. as for 4, he couldnt do that and he knew he couldnt do that, he was trolling you. does that make it ok? u decide.
as for 5, it depends. people are allowed to do that. should mods do it is another question though.
you were misinterpretting the injustices pre-roadman. i thought i made it pretty clear when you asked for transparency that the person who did what you complained about was very likely to get demodded if they did it again
WHICH ONE? WALRUS HAD SEVERAL COMPLAINTS THAT WENT UNADDRESSED - INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TOO:
1. UNJUST TROLLING VIOLATION 2. REFUSAL TO RE-EVALUATE UNJUSTICE TROLLING VIOLATION 3. SLOWBRO BEING A TRASH TALKER INSTEAD OF A MOD 4. SLOWBRO THREATENING TO BAN PEOPLE HE DIDN'T LIKE (WALRUS) 5. MODS ALLOWED TO CALL PEOPLE SLURS BY CLAIMING THAT IT WAS SOMEHOW "OKAY, BECAUSE I AM ALSO [SLUR HERE]"
you were misinterpretting the injustices pre-roadman. i thought i made it pretty clear when you asked for transparency that the person who did what you complained about was very likely to get demodded if they did it again
THERE WERE CLEAR ABUSES OF POWER AND CORRUPT MODS ON THE TEAM JUST BEFORE ROADMAN TOOK OVER. WALRUS IS NOT SAYING ONE TEAM IS BETTER THAN THE OTHER, BUT YOU IMPLIED THAT THE PRE-ROADMAN MOD TEAM IS/WAS BETTER THAN THE POST-ROADMAN MOD TEAM.
WAS JUST WONDERING IF THAT WERE THE CASE THEN WHY ARE THE SAME TYPES OF INJUSTICE OCCURRING.
time has flown by a lot and a lot of my good and bad times have kinda mushed together. it's probably a tie between the time i was breaking hof win% and being a part of the mod team just before roadman
WHY NOT HOLD YOUR TEAM TO THE STANDARDS YOU SUGGEST ROADMAN'S TEAM SHOULD BE HELD TO?
time has flown by a lot and a lot of my good and bad times have kinda mushed together. it's probably a tie between the time i was breaking hof win% and being a part of the mod team just before roadman
if you could choose 6 other all-time players to make a fancy pants table, who would they be