Back to General Discussion

why we shouldn't use non-usernames

over 10 years

to refer to users

im a casual schmuck who occasionally browses main lobby forums, similar to most people. i go to argue on the internet which is a hobby of mine and i see people agreeing or disagreeing with eachother or pointing to something someone else said, but referring to those people by a name nobody outside of some clique knows.

i find it difficult to immerse myself in good drama if i have to puzzle together who the f**k babydaddypapalongsocks is when no such user exists. i also speak on behalf of lurkers who definitely share my dismay.

please refer to users by their usernames

i think that referring to users by their username is the sensible and polite thing to do on a public forum
12
yes i agree
2
no i disagree
deletedover 10 years
its the weeb club that calls everyone by their name
over 10 years
lad = calvin
over 10 years
who am i?
over 10 years
here are my course notes. i copied from rutabega

Ryuko - Connor
projectmatt - pjm
Bae - Kerry
hardeffingworker - Ian
roadman - Harry

with the exception of projectmatt none of these names are even similar and i thought Ian was that lad guy for a bit
deletedover 10 years
No. That's dumb.
deletedover 10 years
it's the least we can do
deletedover 10 years
im going to make a complaints thread against vancy if he doesn't delete this thread with the reason being "adsense"
over 10 years
and read the chapter before every lecture
over 10 years
just take notes