no im complaining about them being done 2 quickly to properly read them, auto-sustaining means doing it automatically hence the word auto if you are re-reading the and looking like you did (which is good) then that is good lol im talking about the cases where it is evident it wasn't read because either the first report held no evidence so it is only the moderators word for it
Side note : when I was a mod, for too long might I add. There would literally be 10 appeals stacked and I'd be the only one rereading the games and giving a verdict, then they'd stay open for another 5 business days, because no mod wanted to touch appeals. Now you're complaining about them doing the job quickly? Lol
If the mod reviewed the game, like they're supposed to do, as per the appeal system and they decided that the initial mod was correct............
if they sustain <2 minutes do you think they actually reviewed it? ie. vilden's appeal was done so quickly and he proved it had no pictures so how could it have been reviewed, maybe make it so the mod who has the appeal against them shouldn't go and tell co-mods oh review this or that
It doesn't matter if the appeal sits in open for 5 hosits when only one mod is needed to either sustain or vote to OT, in which case a third mod would get into the ring. The appeal system is literally one of the only things that has no flaws, other than human error in it on this site lol
Harry, as your rise to admin can you please set rules against auto-sustaining? ie. waiting at least 5 hours before sustaining for some mods can see it.
Also, yes it is unfortunate that mods care more about HC than in-game violations which is what should be important on this site. Yet the focus is on the forums, some mod(s) have done 0-1 report (the one was mod-abuse) but have time to suspend users from the forums. #coolstorybro
Anyone complaining about auto sustaining reports is an idiot
Harry, as your rise to admin can you please set rules against auto-sustaining? ie. waiting at least 5 hours before sustaining for some mods can see it.
Also, yes it is unfortunate that mods care more about HC than in-game violations which is what should be important on this site. Yet the focus is on the forums, some mod(s) have done 0-1 report (the one was mod-abuse) but have time to suspend users from the forums. #coolstorybro
deletedover 8 years
It's weird to me that HC seems to be moderated almost as much as in-game violations
When there are almost as many people given violations for HC than there are GT, ISP, etc., you know it's probably an issue
deletedover 8 years
Dude i wished banned users pmd me. All i get is abc frequently reporting me for being rednose
deletedover 8 years
Why do I keep getting weirdly cryptic PMs lmao
deletedover 8 years
Why people feel like they are entitled to use slurs after being informed is beyond me.
idk why people feel so entitled to be offended by meaningless words from an anonymous person off the internet. Ni**a just close ya eyes.
If this thread were a user it'd have committed enough of Ian's violations to be perma banned by now.
deletedover 8 years
Why people feel like they are entitled to use slurs after being informed is beyond me.
idk why people feel so entitled to be offended by meaningless words from an anonymous person off the internet. Ni**a just close ya eyes.
Daddy's home!!! What have I missed this is the thread that doesn't end
deletedover 8 years
the 605 HC violations are actually in the past 3 months. apparently the expiration on HC was changed to 3 months.
This just keeps getting worse lol
deletedover 8 years
SonicTheHuman the fact that you just typed letters a manner that vaguely resembles the r word but not quite is absolutely disgusting, and you should be disgusted with yourself.
deletedover 8 years
If you keep Ian banned you must also ban SonicTheHuman. They're a package deal now.