36 hours per day, 12 hours per night. Days may end early if a majority lynch is reached.
II. The Setup:
Normal closed roles setup, as always, with the roles and affixes listed below. Any role can be town or mafia, and have any number of affixes.
By default there are no Night 1 actions, including the mafia kill.
By default no role can self visit, except watcher.
Players who share a meeting may communicate outside the game at any time of day.
Players are always notified at day start if their role is changed.
One mafia always leads the kill, and it's always the one that submits the kill last. Each mafia will visit the kill target.
On death, players flip their role, alignment and affix type by default, but not their affix details.
III. Supermajority Lynch Rules:
A lynch will happen immediately if a supermajority vote is reached (e.g. 9/16)
At end of day, "No votes" count as "no one" votes, but will not count towards a mid-day supermajority vote of "no one". The player with the most votes at that end of day, (including "no one") will be lynched.
Days can be ended early without a lynch by a supermajority "no one" vote.
Perish was just correcting me about who you were voting. You seemed to be pushing on Gerry so I had assumed you were the person who apologized ot him and voted him earlier.
How do you think that means I was scumreading you?? I was pointing out your vote to Sincerely! I did not say "she's voting me therefore is scum!!!! D:"
deletedalmost 9 years
I fossed Transcend way before itg said a word so your logic is null.
waht the heck is your point??? i was pointing out to sinc you were voting me when she was asking why you were still pushing on gerry. that has nothing to do with anything! that was from before i ever pushed on you! you're wrong and you're grasping for ammo by pulling out completely out of context quotes!!!
antikrist, you helped itg tunnel transcend for a reason that wasn't particularly alignment-telling. I guess I haven't scrutinized you enough and I'm probably projecting onto other players lmao
and besides, it's not an OMGUS if I have logic besides "anyone voting me must be scum", which clearly isn't my logic because i didn't mind your vote being on me because yes i can understand i haven't played impeccably and a vote on my isnt a massive red flag to me at this point
Retti seems to be gone and this is a shitstorm. Can we just decide on a lynch?
Sonrio: towntold excessively when being lynched, but has done nothing else.
Perish and Claire: are both saying things I just can't see them saying as mafia right now, so they aren't good lynches for today.
Stragger: Null, going to put a pastebin here that I DESPERATELY want if we don't lynch him. Has the potential to towntell or scumtell, I think.
Gerry: Not outing why for the 80th time but I do NOT want this lynch today.
itg: has a really idiotic play that could be scum but is somewhat different from last game, too. Not sure why no one else is willing to consider this lynch; they probably aren't a super OP mafia PR or anything, but they don't have as many conspicuous towntells. They also literally justified an omgus and they are apparently apathetic about this lynch despite claiming people have towntold in their eyes, since they voted someone not currently on the chopping block. And they keep pushing Stragger because if some very wild-guess/shot-in-the-dark logic.
antikrist: sheeps too much and towntells by insulting and getting emotional. I understand Gerry's read on them but I feel suspicious of the way they were being overlooked until perish voted them.
stove: even their possibly-towny daystart wasn't alignment telling when you consider they're an isper.
probably missed some posts and I'm guessing Transcend isn't being lynched today no matter what.
I'm fine with being ML but I feel like I'd be of more use later on.
deletedalmost 9 years
No resistance? The topic of voting Claire came up half the day. I have a TR on them and, from their comment about putting up a united vote, I was caving for the sole purpose of that before I got off.
i just thought the Claire vote made zero sense from anti's perspective. they have every reason not to lynch Claire and yet they just caved with little to no resistance. i get the whole "i just want to lynch SOMEONE" thought process but not even half a page ago they were still resisting. it read fake as hell and i thought they should have to defend themselves for it. i wasn't letting it pass by unnoticed. perhaps had they actually outted some goddamn logic when they made their vote i wouldn't have to assume the worst in order to get some explanations out of you people!!
deletedalmost 9 years
In a vain attempt not to be bw on, I'm voting Stove.
