36 hours per day, 12 hours per night. Days may end early if a majority lynch is reached.
II. The Setup:
Normal closed roles setup, as always, with the roles and affixes listed below. Any role can be town or mafia, and have any number of affixes.
By default there are no Night 1 actions, including the mafia kill.
By default no role can self visit, except watcher.
Players who share a meeting may communicate outside the game at any time of day.
Players are always notified at day start if their role is changed.
One mafia always leads the kill, and it's always the one that submits the kill last. Each mafia will visit the kill target.
On death, players flip their role, alignment and affix type by default, but not their affix details.
III. Supermajority Lynch Rules:
A lynch will happen immediately if a supermajority vote is reached (e.g. 9/16)
At end of day, "No votes" count as "no one" votes, but will not count towards a mid-day supermajority vote of "no one". The player with the most votes at that end of day, (including "no one") will be lynched.
Days can be ended early without a lynch by a supermajority "no one" vote.
You're voting me and yet I've already shown why your reasoning for me being scum is dead wrong. You call me passive and lacking reads/pushes and just pure AtE with no logic but that's flat out wrong. It conflicts with the cold facts if you actually reread the game. You screwed up.
deletedalmost 9 years
i read what was important to me and made a pastebin highlighting the things i read, but isn't this against the point? i don't understand the huge issue on stating your reads again and why you are being so aggressive. this doesn't make me want to change my mind if i haven't been clear about this already.
i've refuted what you have to say, so this "burden of proof" is a load of crap. Your read is bad and you're bad too. you probably didn't actually read and just threw together some justification by dartboarding it
I'mma just vote whatever sincerely wants in the end
deletedalmost 9 years
i'm no god gift's to town. when did i imply that? i merely do what i believe what will be helpful and get my point across best. i ask to be treated the same as everyone else and i am merely asking you simply things while you throw a fit.
YOU TRY TO PRESENT YOURSELF AS GOD'S GIFT TO THIS TOWN, OUR LOGICAL SAVANT WHO WILL DELIVER US, VERITABLE FOOLS, TO A WORLD OF SKILLED PLAY AND READS, BUT YOU ACT LIKE A CHILD AND REFUSE TO EVEN DO THE RESEARCH YOURSELF ON THE PEOPLE YOU'RE SUPPOSEDLY SCRUTINIZING.
deletedalmost 9 years
then im going to ignore you because the burden of proof is on you given that you are continuing to the same exact things i scumread you for in the first place.
I don't like his one read on sincerely I think I said that earlier. It was random and didn't really give insight. I think he said page 30 but i'm too lazy to look
CLAIRE - SCUM TRANSCEND - MIXED VIBES AS I JUST EXPLAINED SINCERELY - TOWN (IRRELEVANT NOW THAT SHE'S CLEAR) SIRSLICK - I SAID HE WAS SCUMMY WHEN HE INITIALLY VOTED STOVE AND NOW SEEING STOVE ISN'T SCUM I'M INCLINED TO AGREE WITH MY FIRST INSTICT ANTIKRIST - I HAD HER AS SCUM BUT NOW SHE'S DEAD SO WOW I GUESS I JUST SUCK.
man i'mma just town read him for writing all that. if he took that much effort as mafia kudos to you bruh. I still am sticking in wanting to lynch in transcend/itg/tucker
DID YOU READ THE GAME BECAUSE I REPEATEDLY GAVE MY READS YOU DIMWIT.
deletedalmost 9 years
i don't want to get in another spat with you where you try and bludgeon me over the head with about how im misreading you. just show to me that you want to scumhunt instead of exchanging anger walls with me.
To counter Straggers points there is zero way I can prove this but at one point I was very upset and done with this game wanting to sub myself out I would not play that card as mafia because it's a very weak card to play and I hold more pride then that
I have been scum hunting but I've done it in my own style while having fun with it but no one agrees with my reads so I shut up for now when my league game is over i'll cb
I laid out a bunch of my reads yesterday. Today I've been doing other things and haven't had the time to reassess. i was planning on reading closer on Gerry because honestly he was never active when i was and he didn't catch my attention when I read the beginning of the game the first time around. I've already explained in the past that I have mixed reads on Transcend and think that while a lot of his actions has been poor, and off step, his given content feels towny. not to mention the fact that AT LEAST HE DIDN'T VOTE FRICKING STOVE.
So your scumread on me boils down to "you're aggressive and therefore you're scum." THAT'S SO DUMB. AGGRESSION ISN'T AN ALIGNMENT TELL. I'm not hamming it up to AtE, this is how I'm playing this game and at least I didn't just throw my hands in the air and vote the guy who had literally 0 content
