gonna bump this cuz i finished this sh*t yesterday
pretty much this
there really wasn't enough to convict him, no way he kills her in the house and there's 0 trace of it. He isn't Dexter, he didn't plastic bag his whole god damn house while brutally murdering her. the kid was literally confused as hell and you could tell by his body language in the interviews that he was just answering questions how he thought the cops wanted him to answer them,
the series as a whole is obviously biased in favour of steve, so i'm holding back whether i think he's innocent or guilty, i just know that the lack of physical evidence alone, with the fact that witnesses were contradicting each others timelines means he shouldn't have been convicted.
one thing i would've wanted them to go further into details about was the timeline of the interviews and when Rachel Avery first told detectives about the birthday party incedent - primarily since it's obvious her family made her change her testimony and say she made it up, but had that incident happened prior to detectives screwing with Brendan's head i would be sold on that alone.
i'm currently on ep 9. two out of 1 counts say that he's guilty which is BS because there's a lack of evidence that shows he did it. the house was searched like 12 times. the investigators found the key on 7th = 100% weird. there was no victim DNA in the bathroom or any blood from the house to the place where teresa's body was buried.
