almost 10 years

Logic:
Rockstar makes a game with the ability to torture people, shoot people, beat the living hell out of people, rob stores and kill officers of the law. ESRB: Sure, just give it an M for mature rating so kids can still buy it but parents who care wont buy it for them. Rockstar makes a game, 10 years earlier, with the same concepts, but a sex minigame called "hot coffee" in san andreas with ZERO NUDITY. ESRB: OH OH THE KIDS CANT SEE THIS A FOR ADULT RATING A FOR ADULT UNLESS THEY TAKE THAT OUT!

What is more harmful to children. breasts or Uzis?

boobies or uzis: whats worse for kids
8
uzis
1
boobies
deletedalmost 10 years
how many kids do u know that regularly watch the news lol
deletedalmost 10 years
The GTA San Andreas thing wasn't a minigame, it is actually a mod. There is a big difference, you're saying that Rockstar made a video game about sex.

You cannot rob stores in GTA San Andreas. And also, I'm pretty sure kids watch these stuff in the news or in games. Pretty much on a daily basis in their lives. (except sex)
almost 10 years
What about the kids who play M rated games and don't end up shooting/stabbing/stealing/ anyone
almost 10 years
b00bz dont kill people, people do
almost 10 years

FutureHendrix says

children get their games, theres nothing stopping them.


except an ERSB rating, right?
almost 10 years
the combination of both or one itself could give the game an adult rating though
almost 10 years
children get their games, theres nothing stopping them.
almost 10 years
parents who let their children play inappropriate games is the answer
almost 10 years
is the answer not obvious!