almost 9 years

Logic:
Rockstar makes a game with the ability to torture people, shoot people, beat the living hell out of people, rob stores and kill officers of the law. ESRB: Sure, just give it an M for mature rating so kids can still buy it but parents who care wont buy it for them. Rockstar makes a game, 10 years earlier, with the same concepts, but a sex minigame called "hot coffee" in san andreas with ZERO NUDITY. ESRB: OH OH THE KIDS CANT SEE THIS A FOR ADULT RATING A FOR ADULT UNLESS THEY TAKE THAT OUT!

What is more harmful to children. breasts or Uzis?

boobies or uzis: whats worse for kids
8
uzis
1
boobies
deletedalmost 9 years
how many kids do u know that regularly watch the news lol
deletedalmost 9 years
The GTA San Andreas thing wasn't a minigame, it is actually a mod. There is a big difference, you're saying that Rockstar made a video game about sex.

You cannot rob stores in GTA San Andreas. And also, I'm pretty sure kids watch these stuff in the news or in games. Pretty much on a daily basis in their lives. (except sex)
almost 9 years
What about the kids who play M rated games and don't end up shooting/stabbing/stealing/ anyone
almost 9 years
b00bz dont kill people, people do
almost 9 years

FutureHendrix says

children get their games, theres nothing stopping them.


except an ERSB rating, right?
almost 9 years
the combination of both or one itself could give the game an adult rating though
almost 9 years
children get their games, theres nothing stopping them.
almost 9 years
parents who let their children play inappropriate games is the answer
almost 9 years
is the answer not obvious!