This makes any setup with doc/watcher cop/hooker/doc completely pointless the maf finding power roll will just keep getting hit, the doc has no reason to even save
it was announced two rounds ago with BV comped
still intact last round with B2NS comped
and mafia didn't do it because it completely ruins their game if the town decides to lynch on the day before the meteor night and hits mafia
you're being stupid dude lol
deletedalmost 9 years
This makes any setup with doc/watcher cop/hooker/doc completely pointless the maf finding power roll will just keep getting hit, the doc has no reason to even save
When did it change to this? IIRC it used to be if the burden to kill was on the mafia, then you were forced to kill outside of the clear unless they were in autolose, because they had the penalty of trying to nk over and over.
If the doctor keeps saving a certain kill, out of which the mafia can't kill due to the result of an autoloss scenario, then the burden lies on the doctor not mafia.
Anthony is talking about a situation where killing outside of the clear which does not result in autoloss. I still think the onus should not lie with the doctor in a situation where the mafia are able to kill a player outside the clear without resulting in autoloss.
also like i said it's nearly impossible to give mafia a GT vio for anything they plan, and telling them they're not allowed to use a strategy that is indeed a strategy is stupid & not going to happen
anyone who brings up BV in an argument is pretty stupid because if mafia continue to hit the cop with doc saving them no matter what on day 4 (or 3 if d1 was a save) the cop will have enough reports to just get the doctor to claim and lynch in blues,
yes, on MYLO.
if either mafia role is lynched the town would be equip with at least 3 clears removing the 3way or 4way no clears, so the mechanics you're all so scared of really isn't helping your argument if you expand your mind
Tucker is absolutely right. And why is gerry mod? Like, really? Didnt we have enough of him already? Are we trying to infiltrate the website completely?
Town isn't aloud to play strategically, they just have to bend to the whim of how mafia feels like playing
that's already how the game is played.
deletedalmost 9 years
This is dumb, make the mafia who is refusing to take a 1v1 against the doc get the violation. Not the doc himself.
Mafia who repeat this process are abusing the mechanics of the site to their advantage.
This. This. This.
Tucker this was a mistake and you know it, in that game I was saving as Doctor because I was playing optimally by saving the guy who was claiming Cop. I had claimed in that game, so the mafia knew I was Doctor. But they were still trying to kill the same person who claimed Cop, even though they knew he wasn't cop since they had Janitor and Cop was janned.
When did it change to this? IIRC it used to be if the burden to kill was on the mafia, then you were forced to kill outside of the clear unless they were in autolose, because they had the penalty of trying to nk over and over.
If the doctor keeps saving a certain kill, out of which the mafia can't kill due to the result of an autoloss scenario, then the burden lies on the doctor not mafia.
Anthony is talking about a situation where killing outside of the clear which does not result in autoloss. I still think the onus should not lie with the doctor in a situation where the mafia are able to kill a player outside the clear without resulting in autoloss.
this
deletedalmost 9 years
When did it change to this? IIRC it used to be if the burden to kill was on the mafia, then you were forced to kill outside of the clear unless they were in autolose, because they had the penalty of trying to nk over and over.
If the doctor keeps saving a certain kill, out of which the mafia can't kill due to the result of an autoloss scenario, then the burden lies on the doctor not mafia.
Anthony is talking about a situation where killing outside of the clear which does not result in autoloss. I still think the onus should not lie with the doctor in a situation where the mafia are able to kill a player outside the clear without resulting in autoloss.
Now I'm wondering about using my 2 slots yet I haven't gamethrew to save some clears or towntells as doctor, focus on me rather than lose them leading town to loss. It's better for me to get meteor than losing some towntell and outing as doctor on lylo making me sure dead and town most likely to loss. As I told meteor > town loss. When I get 2 vios stop playing setups with doctors.
Now I'm wondering about using my 2 slots yet I haven't gamethrew to save some clears or towntells as doctor, focus on me rather than lose them leading town to loss. It's better for me to get meteor than losing some towntell and outing as doctor on lylo making me sure dead and town most likely to loss. As I told meteor > town loss. When I get 2 vios stop playing setups with doctors.
i only argue because imo it kills the point of the protective role and lets mafia steal a clear away from town if town had done 'well' enough to keep/obtain a clear
When did it change to this? IIRC it used to be if the burden to kill was on the mafia, then you were forced to kill outside of the clear unless they were in autolose, because they had the penalty of trying to nk over and over.
If the doctor keeps saving a certain kill, out of which the mafia can't kill due to the result of an autoloss scenario, then the burden lies on the doctor not mafia.
To be honest though, it's more like exploitation of a situation Vs win conditions for 1 night action.
it is nearly impossible for mafia to collectively gamethrow, just saying.
forcing the mafia to do anything outside of voting for someone on a meteor night is stupid.
deletedalmost 9 years
When did it change to this? IIRC it used to be if the burden to kill was on the mafia, then you were forced to kill outside of the clear unless they were in autolose, because they had the penalty of trying to nk over and over.
If the doctor keeps saving a certain kill, out of which the mafia can't kill due to the result of an autoloss scenario, then the burden lies on the doctor not mafia.
When did it change to this? IIRC it used to be if the burden to kill was on the mafia, then you were forced to kill outside of the clear unless they were in autolose, because they had the penalty of trying to nk over and over.
I can understand both sides of the argument, but like, at this point it's best not to argue about it and just accept what the current admin believes is correct.