Intentionally making someone lose when you both can win at the same time should count as trolling. For example, when both spy and killer can joint to hit BP in Coco, spy hitting killer (or visa versa) should count as trolling.
This is because actions like these are always done with the intention to troll. Of course, if you need someone to lose so your own win condition can be fulfilled, then this is acceptable. However, intentionally stopping their win condition when both of you clearly can win together should be trolling.
Nope you get exactly the same number of points. its just a jerk move to decide that you are the only one who can win, rather than giving someone else points too.
Making someone else lose is not trolling/gamethrowing, only if you lose yourself, which is obviously not happening by killing the player you could joint with.
Simple solution though: don't play cocos
deletedover 9 years
If both killer and spy backstab each other in coco's at the end of a game, does the win go to village or does it end with being unranked?
just for clarification purposes, this was just for his Coco's example. If the spy hits the killer when they're going to win that night as a backstab it shouldn't be trolling or anything, it's just a backstab and that's just how life works. You can't punish someone for that
deletedover 9 years
I don't really get or agree with the trolling rule. It seems like a catch-all for anyone who's ever a .
