I have an idea; instead of people as moderators, we have a moderator bot. He does everything, and he communicates short sentences, answering questions like "What is moderator bot?" "What is your favorite game?" And things like that.
ALSO he can paint, and makes memes for the site.
He can read reports, and know just what to do, and enforce meaningless regulations, just to show how well he simulates a real moderator.
Or we can vote Benjamin for mod. That will solve all of our problems. there will be no need for mods to look at games because they'll be all busy playing chess
deletedabout 10 years
like the reporter could be keywords in for IC and HC words in, and the bot will give the personal opinion?
i think the only thing i could logically envision a bot handling and not having a lot of mistakes is things such as HC, IC, censor bypass and maybe even bypassing suspension.
They could do it site wide then the bot could open a report and note the player for their action the first time. Then any time after it happens the bot could leave the report open for a mod to deal with
deletedabout 10 years
wasn't my idea, but a lot and a lot of boolean values
also there should be a tab for "normal" and "appeal" and if you select an appeal you have to put a report ID in, this would help because then people who dont know the format of appeals dont have to waste the mods' time
deletedabout 10 years
why would someone report someone for non-game and if they did they should appeal it, and the grs bot wont be able to moderate the appeal
i remember talking about automating reports like grs
the solution would appear to be you just set a certain sui%, but then you run into the problem of non-game-related sui, which are still a real thing because life calls. needs human discretion
deletedabout 10 years
i think you could probably program a bot to automatically handle grs reports with at least a 90% accuracy rate. that would cut down on the report pile somewhat.
