Competition in biology, ecology, and sociology, is a contest between organisms, animals, individuals, groups, etc., for territory, a niche, or a location of resources, for resources and goods, mates, for prestige, recognition, awards, or group or social status, for leadership. ?????????
what?????
deletedabout 10 years
logik's pretty justified in being po'd tbh. well besides that bearguru's ploy blew up in his face lol
deletedabout 10 years
who the is playing bear's hearts right now?
no one right now. i'm backing out for the night after getting ignored in two games straight. an ego this deserved needs to be listened to
deletedabout 10 years
it's also true that the competition isn't made to determine who's best
what???
deletedabout 10 years
you're still not establishing why this is unfair, or worth caring about
perhaps that bearguru subbed in a bunch of dudes with trophies to finish his round against a bunch of noobs
its true in this sense that a trophy won by multiple players on an account isn't going to represent the skill level of the account's owner
it's also true that the competition isn't made to determine who's best
deletedabout 10 years
Yeah I'll give you that, the sub-in in his analogy was fresh meaning he had an advantage which isn't the case with BearGuru's subs they just all have big egos lol. however to pretend that you didn't understand what he's saying is just ignorant
deletedabout 10 years
who the is playing bear's hearts right now?
Connor
deletedabout 10 years
you're still not establishing why this is unfair, or worth caring about
are you asserting that all players are equal. furthermore, are you asserting that players exist who are not below me?
deletedabout 10 years
but he could've, if his parents took away his racquet.
you're still not establishing why this is unfair, or worth caring about
deletedabout 10 years
my parents took away my computer, animegayboy69 come play my hearts for me :^)
deletedabout 10 years
I could literally make an analogy about being in a pie eating contest however you have your friend come in mid contest because you get a phone call that your wife is in labour and he finishes the contest and wins..
The point is still there.
the only difference is that the hypothetical situation the sub-in has a clear advantage, which apparently makes it completely "nonsensical" as opposed to just, not-that-good
deletedabout 10 years
Even if I did play tennis, it doesn't mean I'm being elitist by pointing out that the analogy is completely absurd.
deletedabout 10 years
I could literally make an analogy about being in a pie eating contest however you have your friend come in mid contest because you get a phone call that your wife is in labour and he finishes the contest and wins..
i'm very elitist, about my internet mafia hobby. i try to act superior to those who make nonsensical analogies
deletedabout 10 years
You can try to be condescending however you're both wrong lol
(Steven and the anime guy)
deletedabout 10 years
it doesn't need to be changed to a chess tournament. The similarities is the fact that you have someone else winning a competition and you're still getting the fame.
deletedabout 10 years
it's an analogy, doesn't need to be taken literally.
Analogies imply that there's at least some semblance of a similarity between the things being compared, which is clearly not the case when comparing internet mafia to tennis.
lmao
the point is still made and the analogy is still understood despite your elitism about your hobbies
deletedabout 10 years
just change it to a chess tournament
deletedabout 10 years
it's an analogy, doesn't need to be taken literally.
Analogies imply that there's at least some semblance of a similarity between the things being compared, which is clearly not the case when comparing internet mafia to tennis.