I will complain about you in a very educated paragraph
How'd you like it
1
10/10 would complain again
0
It was very complain-y
0
I can't understand...too many big words
deletedalmost 10 years
I doubt that Nick Rutab's compeers will understand the magnitude and importance of what it is that I am about to reveal in this letter. Nevertheless, the possibility that even one such individual might awaken to the truth and begin to understand that Nick's sullen pleas offer only false hopes obliges me to continue. To begin at the beginning, I feel no more personal hatred for Nick than I might feel for a herd of wild animals or a cluster of poisonous reptiles. One does not hate those whose souls can exude no spiritual warmth; one pities them. Well, I've never been a very obedient dog so I intend not only to do exactly that but also to stop defending the raffish status quo and, instead, implement a bold, new agenda for change. I unequivocally hope that if we all offer a framework for discussion so that we can more quickly reach a consensus, this will bring us together in a national dialogue of learning instead of reducing us to recriminations and accusations. At a minimum, I expect it to help a large number of people see that Nick swears that divine ichor flows through his veins. Clearly, he's living in a world of make-believe, with flowers and bells and leprechauns and magic frogs with funny little hats. Back in the real world, I have long suggested we deal with Nick appropriately. Nick, however, rejects this suggestion as a ginned-up effort to undermine his authority. To that I say, Nick's torchbearers have repeatedly been caught paralyzing any serious or firm decision and thereby becoming responsible for the weak and half-hearted execution of even the most necessary measures. I had expected better from him and his vaunted flock, but then again, an important piece of information that was leaked from official sources is that Nick plans on suborning the most parviscient mumpsimuses you'll ever see to shank the working class in the back to keep the cash spigots flowing as soon as our backs are turned.
The prerequisite to understanding this letter is to have encountered some of Orly's jokes and to have realized how intolerant they are. Wait! Before you dismiss me as overbearing, hear me out. It has been proven time and time again that I feel sorry for Orly's castigators. Orly demonizes them relentlessly, typically reciting a laundry list of character faults and random insults without an intelligible word about the substance of what they have to say. I guess that shows that if Orly honestly believes that some of my points are not valid, I would love to get some specific feedback from him.
deletedalmost 10 years
This letter is going to be a book of revelations to many readers. In particular, many will be surprised to learn that the magnitude of Orly's lies should disgust anyone who has an even moderate education. For starters, Orly's premise (that “the norm” shouldn't have to worry about how the exceptions feel) is his morality disguised as pretended neutrality. Orly uses this disguised morality to support his rants, thereby making his argument self-refuting. Now for some parting advice: Look at the facts. Analyze the arguments. Think about the motives of the people who are telling you that Orly is God's representative on Earth. And have confidence in yourself. Remember, his most recent overbearing claim (viz., that people prefer “cultural integrity” and “multicultural sensitivity” to health, food, safety, and the opportunity to choose their own course through life) is a tissue of lies, bias, and emotional manipulation from beginning to end.
Take this example: Let's say that I yearn for a time when anyone with a heart and a brain can rake Appleofmyeye over the coals for making today's oppressiveness look like grade-school work compared to what she has planned for the future. Now let's say that Appleofmyeye accepts—or, at least, feels obligated to pretend to accept—the ideological premises of teetotalism. Does that mean that she's an expert on everything from aardvarks to zymurgy? No, because the way Appleofmyeye orders around her menials causes them to turn inward, reinforcing their own feelings of victimization and loyalty. They typically turn outward only to defuse or undermine incisive critiques of Appleofmyeye's slimy, possession-obsessed behavior by turning them into procedural arguments about mechanisms of institutional restraint. Although Appleofmyeye has no problem with that, one does not have to exhibit a deep disdain for all people who are not obstinate, unhinged whiners in order to analyze her malisons in the manner of sociological studies of mass communication and persuasion. It is an obdurate person who believes otherwise. In closing, it hardly need be said that the views expressed above are tentative and suggestive. You should now go off and perform a thorough study of your own. Of course, this will be an exercise in futility unless you accept the fundamental premise of this letter, namely that Miss Appleofmyeye has no conception of our moral and ethical standards.
I can therefore unquestionably conclude that Appleofmyeye is the most feral psychic of them all and that she has recently stated that if she kicks us in the teeth we'll then lick her toes and beg for another kick. Such statements, like her earlier writings and pronouncements, are a contemptible insult to all decent and feeling people.
I am skeptical of efforts to produce a sophomoric definition of “counterintelligence”. Disguised in this drollery is an important message: This is not the first time I've wanted to rise above the narrow confines of self-existence to the broader concerns of all humanity. But it is the first time I realized that abominable sciolists serve as the priests in her cult of loopy fanaticism. These “priests” spend their days basking in Appleofmyeye's reflected glory, pausing only when Appleofmyeye instructs them to base racial definitions on lineage, phrenological characteristics, skin hue, and religion. What could be more boisterous? One might as well ask, “When she promotes one social program after the next to take care of some segment of society, is she doing it for that segment of society, or is she doing it because she seeks power and position?” Several highly cynical answers suggest themselves, but let it suffice to say that favoritism is a kind of prison. It is also, paradoxically, a haven. It is at once confining and empowering. And in the absence of alternative havens, favoritism will for many of Appleofmyeye's cringers continue to be a source of comfort, something to free them from having to confront the fact that Appleofmyeye is always trying to change the way we work. This annoys me because her previous changes have always been for the worse. I'm positive that Appleofmyeye's new changes will be even more treasonous because that's just one side of the coin. The other side is that people who know me know that I'm very observant. I can identify a feral psychic merely by spotting certain turns of phrase, certain sentence constructions, certain ways of being.
Appleofmyeye craves more power. I say we should give her more power—preferably, 10,000 volts of it. Although our hearts and minds are yearning for a vision of life where love endures, where unity is built, and where freedom finds meaning in truth, Appleofmyeye says that one can understand the elements of a scientific theory only by reference to the social condition and personal histories of the scientists involved. This is patently absurd, as even a cursory examination of the facts will prove. In any event, Appleofmyeye's methods of interpretation are somewhere between a scam and a sham. I'll stand by that controversial statement and even assume that most readers who bring their own real-life experience will agree with it. At a bare minimum, Appleofmyeye has stated that cell-phone towers are in fact covert mind-control devices that use scalar waves to beam images into people's brains while they sleep. I find such declaratory statements quite telling. They tell me that seeing Appleofmyeye up the ante considerably is a nauseating and disgusting spectacle. Get that straight, please. Any other thinking is blame-shoving or responsibility-dodging. Furthermore, now is not the time to go wobbly on our opposition to Appleofmyeye's namby-pamby actions. But there's the rub; Appleofmyeye's inane, sanguinary slogans often resemble an inverted fairy tale in that the triumph of innocence comes at the start and the ugly sisters of aspheterism and solipsism enter on stage in triumph for the final curtain.
Although Appleofmyeye obviously hates my guts (and probably yours as well), if Appleofmyeye were as bright as she thinks she is, she'd know that she has never given expression to any thought or sentiment that could worthily elicit the praise, or even the favorable mention, of the better portion of mankind. I do not say this as one of those negative critics who can always find something wrong with anything. Rather, I say it as someone who firmly believes that you don't need to be a rocket scientist to detect the subtext of this letter. But just in case it's too subliminal for some, let me thrust it into your face right here: Appleofmyeye supports a widespread imposition of Comstockism, and her canards indubitably embrace this desire. For the benefit of any doubting Thomases I will prove that point via an explanation of how Appleofmyeye's principles would have more impact if they were more concise and organized. Instead of trying to be as clear as possible to get her point across, Appleofmyeye seems to like bandying about all kinds of fancy terms that no one's ever heard and that completely diminish her point.
To say that ethical responsibility is merely a trammel of earthbound mortals and should not be required of a demigoddess like Appleofmyeye is discourteous nonsense and untrue to boot. She wonders why everyone hates her. Apparently, she never stopped to think that maybe it's because she can get away with lies (e.g., that she has a fearless dedication to reason and truth) because the average person cannot imagine anyone lying so brazenly. Not one person in a hundred will actually check out the facts for himself and discover that Appleofmyeye is lying. Rather than attempting to work out her disagreements with others, she commonly turns to her friends tapinosis and meiosis, calling her opponents “peevish dunderheads”, “hubristic wankers”, or even “patronizing protestors”. I find that rather sad, primarily because I intend to look closely at Appleofmyeye's solutions to see what makes them so effectual at molding your mind and having you see the world not as it is but as Appleofmyeye wants you to see it. I should expect to find—this is a guess that I currently lack sufficient knowledge to verify—that to understand Appleofmyeye's motives, I avow that we must examine the deep culture of Appleofmyeye's gestapo—its key psychosocial traits, good and bad. If we do so, I predict we'll discover that Appleofmyeye asserts that teachers should teach our children that “the truth”, “the whole truth”, and “nothing but the truth” are three different things. Interestingly, rather than use the word “teach” Appleofmyeye substitutes the phrase, “apply strategies for facilitating learning in instructional situations.” I assume this is to conceal the fact that she has refused to make a public apology for her chippy strictures. So let her call me superstitious; I call her biased.
Incoherent antagonists who do anything and everything needed to further Appleofmyeye's adversarial cause might not recognize the incongruities in Appleofmyeye's hate sheets, but the battle against scapegoatism is a battle over ideas. Nevertheless, it is a battle that must be fought in the context of struggle, not the musings of self-important academics. In other words, purists may object to my failure to present specific examples of Appleofmyeye's smarmy litanies. Fortunately, I do have an explanation for this omission. The explanation demands an understanding of how Appleofmyeye's ignorance is encyclopedic. Be patient; I won't ask you to take that on faith. Rather, I'll provide irrefragable proof that the whole of Appleofmyeye's unambitious worldview may perhaps be expressed in one simple word. That word is “mercantalism”. Let me explain: Appleofmyeye's brand of Mohockism focuses on granting more power to the most wayward gangsters you'll ever see regardless of the implication for others. Appleofmyeye-inspired Mohockism further advocates that these folks use their newly attained power for good or evil as they individually decide. I reject this and every other form of Mohockism because those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Of course, if Appleofmyeye had learned anything from history, she'd know that she was an indecent scamp when I first encountered her. She's an indecent scamp now. And there is no more reason for believing that she will ever cease to be an indecent scamp than there is for supposing that all any child needs is a big dose of television every day.
Appleofmyeye's intoxication with mandarinism is what prompts her to boss others around, but that's really beside the point. There are many roads leading to the defeat of Appleofmyeye's plans to give me reason to waver between the alluring promises of a small-minded, hopeless “new morality” and the sound dictation of my own conscience. I claim that all of these roads must eventually pass through the same set of gates: the ability to take away as many of Appleofmyeye's opportunities for mischief as possible. I oppose Appleofmyeye's claims because they are fork-tongued. I oppose them because they are obtuse. And I oppose them because they will provide material support for terrorism when you least expect it. Ultimately, this is all about choice. We can choose to let Appleofmyeye promote a politics of defeat and demoralization, of pessimism and selfishness, or we can choose to tell her where she can stick it. That's a stark choice. To my mind it isn't even a choice at all. The latter option is the only one that shows the world that Appleofmyeye refuses to come to terms with reality. She prefers instead to live in a fantasy world of rationalization and hallucination.
Appleofmyeye avouches that education should be focused entirely on such bosh as “self-actualization”, “finding one's joy”, “minority empowerment”, “contextualizing knowledge”, and “performing one's identity”. It should have nothing to do with actually gaining knowledge or learning facts, facts such as that Appleofmyeye is secretly planning to pour a few drops of wormwood into our general enthusiasm. I realize that that may sound rather conspiratorial and far-fetched to most people, which is why you need to understand that Appleofmyeye's scribblings have created a lazy universe devoid of logic and evidence. Only within this universe does it make sense to say that every featherless biped, regardless of intelligence, personal achievement, moral character, sense of responsibility, or sanity, should be given the power to lash out at everyone and everything in sight. Only within this universe does it make sense to degrade, divide, and destroy our nation. And, only if we denounce those who claim that we should derive moral guidance from her glitzy, multi-culti, hip-hop, consumption-oriented prank phone calls can we destroy this piteous universe of hers and move as expeditiously as possible to deliver new information about her dishonest blandishments.
I can only hope the readers of this letter are as outraged as I am at Miss Appleofmyeye. There are a number of reasons Appleofmyeye isn't telling us as to why she wants to institutionalize rowdyism through systematic violence, distorted religion, and dubious science. In this letter, I will expose those reasons one-by-one, on the principle that her sophistries always follow the same pattern. She puts the desired twist on the actual facts, ignores inconvenient facts, and invents as many new “facts” as necessary to convince us that once she has approved of something it can't possibly be disgusting. I, for one, have no doubt that she will cause me to wind up in a straitjacket and locked in a padded cell. She has done that before to many others who have dared to disagree with her, and no doubt she will do it again, and again, and again. I allege that my only ability to thwart this mentally deficient effort is to alert the public that Appleofmyeye desperately wants us to believe that genocide, slavery, racism, and the systematic oppression, degradation, and exploitation of most of the world's people are all totally justified. We have two options: sit back and let such lies go unchallenged or fight back with the truth. I have decided to fight back. I shall do so by spreading the truth about how I want nothing more—or less—than to let justice roll down like waters and righteousness like an ever-flowing stream. To that task I have consecrated my life and I invite you to do likewise.
deletedalmost 10 years
Do you recall a time before Mafhere got interested in installing a puppet government that pledges allegiance to his narrow-minded club? If so, then you must be a lot older than I because that's pretty much all Mafhere wants to do nowadays. It isn't important whether you agree with every detail that I intend to present. What matters is that you begin to realize that what Mafhere is doing is not an innocent, recreational sort of thing. It is a criminal activity; it is an immoral activity; it is a socially destructive activity; and it is a profoundly parvanimous activity. He is like a broken record, using the same tired cliches about family and education and safer streets, yet when one looks at the increasing influence of Jacobinism in our culture one sees that Mafhere's signature is on everything. So how come his fingerprints are nowhere to be found? Mafhere doesn't want you to know the answer to that question; he wants to ensure you don't give direction to a universal human development of culture, ethics, and morality. This letter has gone on far too long in my opinion and probably yours as well. So let me end it by saying merely that Mafhere's undertakings are a pastiche of domineering wowserism and vulgar hucksterism.
deletedalmost 10 years
If it turns out that there's unequivocally no way to prevent Apotasy from visiting misery and havoc upon countless millions then I guess it'll be time to throw my cards on the table and call it quits. I'll just have to give up trying to challenge Apotasy's victim-blaming ideology and accept the fact that his malisons are more than clueless. They fill me with a sense of despair. More than anything else, they make me realize that Apotasy appears to have found a new tool to use to help him curry favor with superstitious boeotians using a barrage of flattery, especially recognition of their “value”, their “importance”, their “educational mission”, and other cullionly, vapid nonsense. That tool is Machiavellianism, and if you watch him wield it you'll unquestionably see why there isn't a man, woman, or child alive today who thinks that he has the linguistic prowess to produce a masterwork of meritorious literature, so let's toss out that ridiculous argument of Apotasy's from the get-go. Apotasy has occasionally been successful at agitating for indoctrination programs in local schools. Upon such points his natural character always exhibits itself most determinedly as he further strives to censor by caricature and preempt discussion by stereotype. I can see from the length of what I've written so far that I should save the rest of my comments about Apotasy for a future letter. Let me close by stating simply that the one thing I will fight against for all my days is the practice of muzzy-headed barbarians to pit race against race, religion against religion, and country against country.
deletedalmost 10 years
I have the following advice for Keri: If you can't manage to be grateful for all the things we've done for you, at least have a little dignity, don't whine, and don't expect to be treated like a fragile doll just because you have a theatrically hypersensitive soul and delusions of entitlement. Let's consider for a moment, though, that maybe one could argue that he could use some etiquette lessons. Then doesn't it follow that we have come full-circle? As a final reminder, please don't let Keri's prevarications dissuade you from showing pluck and optimism when presented with threats and terror. Let this letter serve as your compass while you journey through his wilderness of lies.
What do disingenuous thugs, unforgiving, inattentive milksops, and Mr. Bear Guru have in common? If you answered, “They all censor by caricature and preempt discussion by stereotype,” then pat yourself on the back. In the text that follows we will dissect and examine Mr. Guru's belief systems and leave the conclusion, with no tipping of the scales, to the logic of the facts. We begin with the observation that Mr. Guru plans to delude and often rob those rendered vulnerable and susceptible to his snares because of poverty, illness, or ignorance. I don't know if Mr. Guru's torchbearers are complicit in that scheme or are merely clueless. I do know, however, that an insidious form of masochism has taken root in our society. This form of masochism is distinguished by its complete denial of the fact that while we do nothing, those who crush the remaining vestiges of democracy throughout the world are gloating and smirking. And they will keep on gloating and smirking until we rail against the pseudoscience that attempts—and continually fails—to prove that embracing a system of gnosticism will make everything right with the world. That's all I have to say. Thanks for letting me express my feelings.
