No, it's definitely not. The main purpose of voting for independents is to publicize the political disagreements those candidates stand for, and to let other politicians know you care about those issues. That is why people have been voting for independent candidates for years.
deletedalmost 10 years
THE ONE PERSON THAT I WILL NEVER VOTE FOR IS CLOUDS.
This is the first time I'll be legally allowed to vote and if those are the options for the candidates (because I mean, let's get real, voting anyone else is basically the same as not voting) I can already tell how frustratingly conflicted I'm going to be. I dislike both.
The republican candidates don't look strong right now to be honest. Quality over quantity ya know, I think Hilary has a good shot at winning (she's obviously gonna get the democratic nom)
deletedalmost 10 years
where is the "im not old enough to vote and politics bore me" option?
The closest one is Teddy Roosevelt; he is my great grandmas cousin
Then naturally FDR
and the wayyyy back in the day Van Buren
deletedalmost 10 years
Fun fact: I am related to three presidents
WHOOO? How close?
deletedalmost 10 years
Fun fact: I am related to three presidents
deletedalmost 10 years
It's the exact same for Republicans if they voted Mitt
But I'm saying Ron Paul got decently popular in the Republican Party. There was not one in the Democratic Party who got decently popular calling out THEIR lies.