over 9 years

Blacklist setups if it is not a pointfarm

Just because you do not like the setup or you do not understand the setup it does not mean it is not viable for ranked play.

there is absolutely no need to blacklist any setup for red hearts if it is not a pointfarm.

the training noobs wont play the setups that we played in comp lobby

so i am making new setups that we can play for fun.

those setups are not pointfarms.

they are fun setups that we enjoy

let us enjoy those setups in red heart.

dont go around abusing your power to ruin our fun

there is no such thing as "not viable for ranked play" if it is not pointfarm

if the game ends night 1 it is unranked anyways

every setup has something to it

the training players never hipfire or kill randomly as vig like the comp trolls did

they try and learn new fun setups that are small and seem interesting to them

i made a 5 jailer setup and then negged it myself because it was broken

but giga has no right to blacklist any other setup which is not a pointfarm. just coz he doesnt like the setup he blacklists it.

We want to have fun
10 signed
this is our lobby
over 9 years
pranay your english has really come on because of your time at epicmafia and dell. i'd now believe if you rang me and proclaimed to be "fred" from down the street and tried to sell me something even though i'm on the telephone preference service.
over 9 years

Jupiter says

As long as the setups aren't being used to pointfarm, I'm personally fine with it. But setups that tend to end quick can also be easily used to pointfarm, and if it gets to that point it should probably be blacklisted.


Games shouldn't average less than 5 minutes and shouldn't allow a d1 autowin situation due to mechanics not player ups.
over 9 years
As long as the setups aren't being used to pointfarm, I'm personally fine with it. But setups that tend to end quick can also be easily used to pointfarm, and if it gets to that point it should probably be blacklisted.
deletedover 9 years
Main shouldn't even be as restrictive on comp setups as comp was, doing that just enforces a comp aesthetic on any of the former training players who decide to try and play in the competition and basically tells them they're playing second fiddle to the comp refugees.

And it definitely should be a lot less so on red hearts.
deletedover 9 years
yeah, and main lobby is supposed to be less hardcore on what can be played. not being able to try out new roles ranked means we'll never know what can be balanced, what is unbalanced or how to make it work. then, comp and ranked in general will always be a repeat due to no variety. i already see comp setups just being the same things every round. red hearts shouldn't be like this
over 9 years
why would we ever need a point farm besides wolf-blue-mason anyway?
over 9 years
yeah this guy is right just because the game ends quick it does not mean it is a point farm. any setup game can end quick
over 9 years
i am sick of playing the same setups again and again

the site home page introduces several fun roles.

if the site advertisement announces so many great roles, we should have the option to play it ranked

it is not like we are using it to win a trophy

we are playing it in red heart ffs