Fool's win condition is to /get lynched/. The town "pity points" shouldn't have been added in the first place for fool and lyncher.
If a third party can joint with town or mafia to accomplish its intended win condition (like warlock for example) then perfect for them, they can feel free to choose.
But I still fail to see why fool was given the town pity points
deletedover 10 years
stop imposing your wrong opinions onto everybody else
lets be real. if you DO care about overall points (which i cant understand) you will be better off in the long run just jointing with whoever your friend is
you cant get an achievement from jointing with mafia. also hardly anyone actually cares about points when it comes to deciding if you are going to stab your meta-buddies in the back or not
it was my opinion that fool jointing with town (not mafia, as OP has asked) should be considered cheating, as it was almost always because they were playing for the condition of their friends trophy.
the only possible benefits of points are in a competition and when you are farming points to get to a competition. since you can't use thirds in comp anymore, the actual time someone will be motivated by points instead of by who their friends are is negligible
also you have no idea how good my skills are. i can convince you to joint with me and ditch your friend in a game. its like you have never read any game i posted where i demonstrated these skills
No, I don't see myself contradicting myself. Point don't interfere with win condition, so my statement is correct. Fool can win with either alignment, nobody cares the slightest how many points that fool will recieve (maybe the fool, respectively.)
You can't convince a fool to win with you if that fool decided he wants to win with his friends as town, not with you as mafia.
