congrats dude u figured out my setup is a pointfarm. now this is the part where i tell yu why its different - i was intentionally trying to make a farm that would only be played in my lobby and i never pretended it was anything else. you made a setup that you thought was balanced that was a laughable 70% or higher in favor of town , with 100% town win being possible if poli waits until they are townsided. you die hard defend it as being some deep setup when in reality its just an insanely easy setup to win as town. thats it. thats your setup. my setups are intentionally imbalanced. you tried to create a balanced , deep setup and just ended up making an imbalanced piece of garbage.
I didn't know the strategy for Gambit Politics when I made the setup, It took my quite a large number of games to figure it all out.
When I actually figured out the strategy of the setup and I realized that players honestly thought they didn't need strategy for the setup.
How is any setup supposed to be balanced when no one applies any effort? Are balanced setups supposed to completely eliminate the difference between good and bad players?
Over and over again naysayers can't and won't explain how the setup fails, Pointing at a misleading winrate isn't an argument.
100% town win being possible if poli waits until they are townsided? Just saying that doesn't make it true, If you won't explain iyour argument then your just talking .
SirDude
