okay, my bad then, but I'd just call it failed roleswap

This doesn't change the fact that ultimately, you cc'd cop as blue and lead a lynch on the real cop.

This is 100% refund. You can't possibly tell me that this wasnt refund worthy. WE LYNCHED THE COP on d1 this ROBBED ALL CHANCES of a report. IT ROBBED ALL CHANCES of lynching scum. We had a chance to lynch hooker for auto or even nilla. (I clearly fosed Geno on d1 for claiming pr and retracting) This is without a doubt a town win without the GT.

In short, I think it's GT because you claimed PR with only 2 PR claims (both of which were real) and proceeded to lynch one of them as a blue. Had you retracted, there would've only been the 2 PR claims, and there would be no real reason to suspect either of them was mafia. I think initially, you were misguided by Geno's fakeclaim and RS'd, but you should've retracted, or at the very least, tried to force a lynch outside of PRs.

Alright, so basically - I looked at it and then took a 2nd look. Geno claimed PR and then retracted after you had claimed as blue. This looks like an attempt to roleswap. However, afterwards, you hardclaim cop and try to get Hamzz (the real cop) lynched. I understand the benefits of roleswapping - you just made the mistake of roleswapping with mafia and leading on the town. So ultimately, you claimed PR when neither mafia was claiming PR and then proceeded to lead a lynch on the real Cop after effectively outting him as cop when you needlessly hardclaimed. Your play was pretty objectively anti-town. There was no real reason why you thought mafia would be in PRs with only 2 PR claims, with you being the 3rd as a blue. That is why it is GT to me.

it wasnt GT but w/e I'll take that suspension

the fact is that genocya or how he is called claimed PR in the beginning I thought he was real I claimed instead of him that was the whole point but I was wrong