I didn't note this because I don't think this game in itself can be punished. GT requires intent, and I don't think an argument can be made that Rainy at any point during the game was playing to lose. The argument that could be made is Rainy was trolling through extremely suboptimal decisions. If I saw evidence of this happening over a larger sample of games, I'd be more than willing to hand out that violation. But, all I see here is Rainy backing a stupid read and making a mistake. People do stupid things, some more than others. And that was the case here. It's how we learn and sometimes even stumble across a new strat :o

agree, looks no different from mikeyru

time to decide how to deal with these kind of players. if there is a rule being tested here, what is it? "noted" is not an adequate verdict

classic throw by mtlve

how would i know that he was cop report when cop refused to out like a normal being? why refuse to follow the oracle day1? I was clear and hammering all game. we all have our own reads and like you have to let us hammer our srs the whole game for town to win