I haven't read the whole defence from gerryoat1. I've just read the defence from my game and he tried to persuade that he got early killed. It's not good defence, Dreamquakes hasn't explained her behavior why she's lost. Terrible defence.
deletedover 9 years
Justice always reveals
deletedover 9 years
How annoying, you give a time frame, then go back on it. You know gerryoat1 will prove you wrong so you cut it short. Lmao.
First time I saw gerryoat1 deleted from comp games and looked at this report, I thought "how could he be removed from comp? he played good as I played few games with him, no sign of cheating!" But I've just read the link and the accusation is real and strong, I won't describe how, but... https://epicmafia.com/game/4305372/review - that game I played against gerry I didn't see anything suspicious from him, but when Dreamquakes fos'd me over Lady although I told strong reason why I couldn't be illu, anyway she answered "I don't understand your reasoning" and voted me in this annoying way.
i agree, playing 90% (w/e) games together isnt right.. Like Mafia God said in a post on forums..its total meta even if you guys werent going out of EpicMafia to get reads..its just not fair. TO GERRY: I noticed how you were saving you hearts, and i didnt know why...now i know it was so that DreamQuake could get in your games and you would have a higher percentage of winning.
I think yall just focused on "proving how xxx is a cheater" instead of "is cheating included?" just based on the fact that they played alot of games together lol
Actually, I have a response, and I trusted your 24 hour window. It's VERY long, and I'm about to post it now. I don't understand how 3 other mods could vote this without giving me time to reply? I'll post it within the next 10 minutes, even though it is cut short. Is that ok?
We actually had a response ready and we were about to post it... We thought we had 24 hours. This is really unfair.
deletedover 9 years
Cutting short into the 24 hour response period since I'm not going to make the rest of the site wait a day for something that is going to receive a vio no matter how this plays out.
you know what's also a fact? a ratio doesn't show anything that makes it seem like cheating/gamethrowing
deletedover 9 years
It doesn't actually matter how you feel. Your feelings are irrelevant and unnecessary. 37 games, however, aren't feelings. They're a fact. 29/37 isn't a feeling. It's also a fact. Set aside your feelings, they don't belong here.
As much as i've played with gerry, he has strong townplay and wins most of his town games. A bit weaker scum play(quite recognisable by meta or scumtells), but still OK as he is townread by most of people as mafia. Just a point that gerry ia legit strong player. Also not a miracle that round ends on day9, because HI is just random setup,anything can happen with 2-3gunshoots. In conclusion: I think that luminica didnt throw on purpose and gerry legit won it
the way gerry likes to play his game is to make lots of townreads and scumreads. there was a topic a couple weeks ago that suggested people should not play comp with another player more than like 10 or 15 times in a round. that came after zwink and cocacola played a lot of games together. this seems a lot like that situation awhile back. No gamethrowing back then no gamethrowing right now
there is not many games where its even close to being evident that luminica is throwing for gerry. almost half of them have no interactions or really low percentages of throwing.
In gerryoat's defense, I think he is a strong player. He seems to townread and scumread the right people most of the time. Not very sure about the allegation against him and luminica.
dzanek1143
