about 7 years
I had to google mendacious but I quite like that one too. You should do a word of the day thing in your complaints subforum I'd enjoy it
about 7 years
Here you go! My entire methor explaines for you -.-
about 7 years
It is like you live in africa, decide to go to the north pole, but you start drinking water with ice and you like it. And there is plenty of ice and water around...
deletedabout 7 years

vilden says

This "he just got unbanned" argument is stupid btw. All it means is he should be better behaved and not doing stupid sh­it like in the op

Also since harodihg is saying this is a nv, it's probably a vio


you shut up too thanks
deletedabout 7 years


Relevant to most mods rulings these days.
deletedabout 7 years

xxerox says

Oh Recidivism. Nice bait but . . . Your tricks are getting old. Just stop trolling. Please? You will get site banned the way you are going.



xxerox says

Oh Recidivism. Nice bait but . . . Your tricks are getting old. Just stop trolling. Please? You will get site banned the way you are going.



xxerox says

Oh Recidivism. Nice bait but . . . Your tricks are getting old. Just stop trolling. Please? You will get site banned the way you are going.


I think you're being mendacious. Do you know what mendacious means?
about 7 years
Oh Recidivism. Nice bait but . . . Your tricks are getting old. Just stop trolling. Please? You will get site banned the way you are going.
about 7 years
axiomatically is a good word
deletedabout 7 years

xxerox says


Recidivism says

It's not a violation, you idiot. You don't have any proof of that, now do you?


Yes i do.

Its in the fkin/g rules if you bothered to read them:

Pretending to cheating is OGI.


You don't have any proof of that. Prove it.
about 7 years

Recidivism says

It's not a violation, you idiot. You don't have any proof of that, now do you?


Didnt you just say it was
about 7 years

Recidivism says

It's not a violation, you idiot. You don't have any proof of that, now do you?


Yes i do.

Its in the fkin/g rules if you bothered to read them:

Pretending to cheating is OGI.
about 7 years
Well, it is obvious if people didn't change the vote, that his OGI failed.

Doesn't make it less of an OGI.
deletedabout 7 years
It's not a violation, you idiot. You don't have any proof of that, now do you?
about 7 years
Dag never did anything good. He trolled, he OGI and he is getting away with it.
about 7 years
It would be ogi if people's votes were changed. If all it does is disrupt the game or f­uck with people then I'd say trolling
about 7 years
Pretending to cheat so people to think the way you do is a vio.

LOLXD is not a proper way to explain things.

Recidivism, if you want to troll again, you are making it very poorly.

Dag never even once explained himself properly in this thread.
deletedabout 7 years

xxerox says

This is OGI 100% .

No one has the right to no - vio it when it breaks the rules :)


It's not OGI. This is objectively and axiomatically not a violation. Dag didn't do anything wrong, and the precedent supports this.
deletedabout 7 years
I know for a fact it was cheating at one point because lolwot got banned for doing exactly this for like 2 entire years haha
about 7 years
This is OGI 100% .

No one has the right to no - vio it when it breaks the rules :)
about 7 years
I think it's trolling actually
deletedabout 7 years
This is objectively and axiomatically an OGI violation, and always has been.

The real question is if anyone really cares, because I sure don't.
about 7 years
miguel is telling us that mods should give vios when the reporting person thinks that it's vio-worthy

about 7 years
This "he just got unbanned" argument is stupid btw. All it means is he should be better behaved and not doing stupid sh­it like in the op

Also since harodihg is saying this is a nv, it's probably a vio
deletedabout 7 years

sineadiio says


Miguel says


sineadiio says


Miguel says

And hey if there is a valid reason why it is an nv I want to know the insight. I didn't make any accusations, I just stated a simple word "Explain."


Because it was a joke. The mod literally said it in the appeal


Just because you and the mod interpreted it as a joke doesn't hide the offense. Clearly Thea didn't interpret it as such and that's why she reported.


not just me and the mod it was 2 mods since she appealed it


OK
deletedabout 7 years

Miguel says


sineadiio says


Miguel says

And hey if there is a valid reason why it is an nv I want to know the insight. I didn't make any accusations, I just stated a simple word "Explain."


Because it was a joke. The mod literally said it in the appeal


Just because you and the mod interpreted it as a joke doesn't hide the offense. Clearly Thea didn't interpret it as such and that's why she reported.


not just me and the mod it was 2 mods since she appealed it